Correction to: World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Identification and Evaluation of the Additional Effect of Cognitive Training in Balance Physiotherapy.Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2026
   Review
2. Falls in a single brain rehabilitation center: a 3-year retrospective chart review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
   Article
3. Falls and fall-related injuries: prevalence, characteristics, and treatment among participants of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.Frontiers in public health · 2024
   Article
4. Assessing postural balance for predicting falls in individuals with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A prospective cohort study.Brazilian journal of physical therapy
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative.2022

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.