Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37862076›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2023

The Future of Telehealth in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Provider Perspectives in South Carolina.

Valerie Yelverton, Salome-Joelle Gass, Daniel Amoatika, Christopher Cooke, Jan Ostermann, Nabil Natafgi, Nicole L Hair, Bankole Olatosi, Otis L Owens, Shan Qiao and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Satisfaction With Service Delivery Among People With HIV in Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Valerie YelvertonDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9445-7022
Salome-Joelle GassDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Daniel AmoatikaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Christopher CookeDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Jan OstermannDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Nabil NatafgiDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Nicole L HairDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Bankole OlatosiDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Otis L OwensCollege of Social Work, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Shan QiaoSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Xiaoming LiSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Caroline DerrickDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Sharon WeissmanSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality (CHQ), Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Helmut AlbrechtDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA)- T32T32AI007392 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Amy Lynn Corneli, Guido Ferrari · 1990 to 2026
$9.8M
Patient experiences and disparities in telehealth HIV care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study from the Southern USR36HS029267 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI YELVERTON, VALERIE · 2023 to 2023
$42k
AHRQ HHS R36 HS029267NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ensure care continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth has been widely implemented in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care. However, participation in and benefits from telehealth were unequal. This study aims to assess the willingness of people living with HIV (PWH) and HIV care providers to use telehealth and perceptions of the future role of telehealth. In-depth interviews with 18 PWH and 10 HIV care providers from South Carolina assessed their willingness to use telehealth, their perspectives on the future of telehealth in HIV care, and recommendations to improve telehealth. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Most PWH were female (61%), Black/African American (67%), and non-Hispanic (78%). Most PWH (61%) and all providers had used telehealth for HIV care. Most PWH and all providers reported being willing to use or (re-)consider telehealth HIV care services in the future. Providers suggested that telehealth is most suitable for routine HIV care encounters and for established, clinically stable, generally healthy PWH. Attitudes toward telehealth were heterogeneous, with most interviewees valuing telehealth similarly or superior to in-person care, yet >20% perceiving it less valuable. Recommendations to improve telehealth included multilevel strategies to address challenges across four domains: technology, the virtual nature of telehealth, administrative processes, and the sociodemographic profile of PWH. Telehealth in HIV care is here to stay; however, it may not yet be suitable for all PWH and all care encounters. Decision processes related to telehealth versus in-person care need to involve providers and PWH. Existing telehealth options require multilevel adjustments addressing persistent challenges.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsTelemedicineFemaleHIVHumansMalePandemicsSouth CarolinaCOVID-19HIV care servicesqualitative studySouth Carolinatelehealth

Identifiers

PMID37862076
PMCPMC10616939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.