ArticleJAMA network open2023
Sex Disparities in Management and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in acute chest pain care in a multisite U.S. emergency department cohort.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Patient-centered outcomes according to cancer status in cardiac surgery patients: a population-based cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2026Observational
- Unequal Relief: Sex Disparities in Opioid Use for Cardiac Chest Pain in the Emergency Department.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Persistent Sex Disparities in Pre-Hospital Delay Among Patients With STEMI Despite Overall Improvements: Findings From the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Chest Pain Center Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Sex disparities in STEMI pathophysiology: Presentation, treatments, and outcomes.Global cardiology science & practice · 2026Review
- Charlson comorbidity Index for descriptive risk stratification of long-term All-cause mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Acute Coronary Syndromes: State-of-the-Art Diagnosis, Management, and Secondary Prevention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cognition and coronary events: A narrative overview of neurocognitive impairment in ACS patients.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Review
- Intersectionality of inequalities in revascularization and outcomes for acute coronary syndrome in England: nationwide linked cohort study.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative Benefits of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Onsite Fibrinolytic for Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Prolonged pain-to-balloon time still impairs midterm left ventricular function following STEMI.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Sex differences in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous intervention.Open heart · 2025Article
- Sex-related differences in acute coronary syndrome: insights from an observational study in a Yemeni cohort.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Direct economic burden of acute coronary syndromes in the Portuguese National Health Service-facts and trends between 2002 and 2022.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Age and gender disparities in administration of opioid for cardiac chest pain in the emergency department.PloS one · 2025Observational
- Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Scoping Review Across the Care Continuum.Global heart · 2025Article
- Impact of Sex in the Incidence of Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- Lipoprotein Metabolism, Dyslipidemia, and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Women: A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Sex disparities in the management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have received increasing attention. Objective: To evaluate the association of a quality improvement program with sex disparities among patients with ACS. Design, Setting, and Participants: The National Chest Pain Centers Program (NCPCP) is an ongoing nationwide program for the improvement of quality of care in patients with ACS in China, with CPC accreditation as a core intervention. In this longitudinal analysis of annual (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020) cross-sectional data of 1 095 899 patients with ACS, the association of the NCPCP with sex-related disparities in the care of these patients was evaluated using generalized linear mixed models and interaction analysis. The robustness of the results was assessed by sensitivity analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022. Exposure: Hospital participation in the NCPCP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in treatment and outcomes between men and women with ACS. Prehospital indicators included time from onset to first medical contact (onset-FMC), time from onset to calling an emergency medical service (onset-EMS), and length of hospital stay without receiving a percutaneous coronary intervention (non-PCI). In-hospital quality indicators included non-PCI, use of statin at arrival, discharge with statin, discharge with dual antiplatelet therapy, direct PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), PCI for higher-risk non-ST-segment elevation ACS, time from door to catheterization activation, and time from door to balloon. Patient outcome indicators included in-hospital mortality and in-hospital new-onset heart failure. Results: Data for 1 095 899 patients with ACS (346 638 women [31.6%] and 749 261 men [68.4%]; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [12.4] years) from 989 hospitals were collected. Women had longer times for onset-FMC and onset-EMS; lower rates of PCI, statin use at arrival, and discharge with medication; longer in-hospital delays; and higher rates of in-hospital heart failure and mortality. The NCPCP was associated with less onset-FMC time, more direct PCI rate for STEMI, lower rate of in-hospital heart failure, more drug use, and fewer in-hospital delays for both men and women with ACS. Sex-related differences in the onset-FMC time (β = -0.03 [95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01), rate of direct PCI for STEMI (odds ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.06-1.17]), time from hospital door to balloon (β = -1.38 [95% CI, -2.74 to -0.001]), and rate of in-hospital heart failure (odds ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.94]) were significantly less after accreditation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this longitudinal cross-sectional study of patients with ACS from hospitals participating in the NCPCP in China, sex-related disparities in management and outcomes were smaller in some aspects by regionalization between prehospital emergency and in-hospital treatment systems and standardized treatment procedures. The NCPCP should emphasize sex disparities to cardiologists; highlight compliance with clinical guidelines, particularly for female patients; and include the reduction of sex disparities as a performance appraisal indicator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.