Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37862013›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Community-Based Point-of-Diagnosis Hepatitis C Treatment for Marginalized Populations: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Meghan D Morris, Claire McDonell, Annie F Luetkemeyer, Robert Thawley, Jeff McKinney, Jennifer C Price

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03987503 phase4completednot on this map

The No One Waits Study: Acceptability and Feasibility of Community-based Point-of-diagnosis HCV Treatment Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2020 to 2022Enrolled87ConditionsHepatitis C, ChronicArmsEpclusa (SOF/VEL), Standard of care, Fibroscan® 430 Mini Plus
NCT07631559 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of an Adapted Partner Navigation Intervention Booster Session for Sustained Healthcare Engagement Among People Who Inject Drugs

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsHEPATITIS C (HCV), Opioid Use Disorder, Substance Use Disorder (SUD), Drug Use DisordersArmsPartner navigation intervention booster session
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of the hepatitis c virus screening program in the Marche Region (Italy): experience from the Pesaro-Urbino health authority.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meghan D MorrisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Claire McDonellDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Annie F LuetkemeyerDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Robert ThawleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Jeff McKinneyLiver Center, University of California, San Francisco.
Jennifer C PriceDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Disparities persist in testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV), leaving socially marginalized populations less likely to benefit from curative treatment. Linkage services are often insufficient to overcome barriers to navigating the medical system and contextual factors. Objective: To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of HCV treatment at the point of HCV infection diagnosis disclosure in a nonclinical community setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-arm nonrandomized controlled trial conducted between July 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, street-outreach recruitment targeted people experiencing homelessness and injecting drugs in an urban US community who were eligible for simplified HCV treatment. Interventions: Study procedures were designed to reflect the community environment and services needed to provide HCV testing, disclosure, and treatment in a nonclinical site. The test-and-treat No One Waits (NOW) model of care provided a 2-week starter pack of 400 mg of sofosbuvir and 100 mg of velpatasvir at time of HCV RNA results disclosure. Participants were transitioned to insurance-provided sofosbuvir-velpatasvir when feasible to complete a 12-week treatment course. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 or later (SVR12). Acceptability end points were treatment initiation and completion. Safety end points were treatment discontinuation because of a late exclusion criterion and adverse events. Results: Of the 492 people (median [IQR] age, 48 [37-58] years; 62 [71%] male) who underwent anti-HCV testing, 246 (50%) tested anti-HCV positive, and 111 (23%) tested HCV RNA positive and were eligible for simplified HCV treatment. Eighty-nine of the 111 eligible participants (80%) returned for confirmatory RNA results, and 87 (98%) accepted and initiated HCV treatment. Seventy (80%) were currently injecting drugs, 83 (97%) had an income below the poverty line, and 53 (61%) were currently unsheltered. Most had HCV genotype 1a (45 [52%]) or 3 (20 [23%]). Sixty-nine (79%) completed 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir treatment, 2 stopped treatment because of low adherence, and 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 66 participants who completed treatment and had a successful blood draw, 61 (92%) had undetectable HCV RNA at treatment completion. Of the 87 treated patients, 58 achieved SVR12, leading to a treatment response of 67% (95% CI, 56%-76%) among the intention-to-treat group and 84% (95% CI, 73%-92%) among the per-protocol group. There were no adverse events, late exclusions, or deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial of HCV treatment at the point of diagnosis, the NOW model of care reduced steps between HCV testing and treatment initiation and resulted in high levels of treatment initiation, completion, and cure. The NOW model of care can expand the current HCV test-and-treat toolkit by reaching a broader population of marginalized communities and expediting curative therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03987503.

Indexed as

Hepatitis CHepatitis C, ChronicAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesBenzopyransCarbamatesFemaleHepacivirusHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRNASofosbuvirTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsBenzimidazolesBenzopyransCarbamatesHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsRNASofosbuvirvelpatasvir

Identifiers

PMID37862013
PMCPMC10589813
OpenAlexW4387799339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.