ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2023
Impact of boost sequence in concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Detection of Glioma: Investigating Inflammatory Markers (CRP), Kidney, and Liver Function.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Article
- Nomogram for radiation-induced lymphopenia in patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy based-chemoradiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A multi-institutional study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe standard of care for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is maximal surgical resection followed by conventional fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with a total dose of 60 Gy. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal boost technique for CCRT in GBM.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 398 patients treated with CCRT between 2016 and 2021, using data from two institutional databases. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving sequential boost (SEB, N = 119) and those receiving simultaneous integrated boost (SIB, N = 279). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To minimize differences between the SIB and SEB groups, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.
resultsThe median follow-up period was 18.6 months. Before PSM, SEB showed better OS compared to SIB (2-year, 55.6% vs. 44.5%, p = 0.014). However, after PSM, there was no significant difference between two groups (2-year, 55.6% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.300). The boost sequence was not associated with inferior OS before and after PSM (all p-values > 0.05). Additionally, the rates of symptomatic pseudo-progression were similar between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.75, p = 0.055).
conclusionsThis study found no significant difference in OS between SEB and SIB for GBM patients treated with CCRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to determine the optimal boost techniques for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37861921What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.