ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
Development and validation of a novel risk stratification model and a survival rate calculator for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: a multi-institutional cohort study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop and validate a novel risk stratification model and a web-based survival rate calculator to improve discriminative and predictive accuracy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the rituximab era.
methodsWe retrospectively collected pre-treatment data from 873 primary DLBCL patients who received R-CHOP-based immunochemotherapy regimens at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2018. An independent cohort of 175 DLBCL patients from Fujian Cancer Hospital was used for external validation.
findingsAge, ECOG PS, number of extranodal sites, Ann Arbor stage, bulky disease, and LDH levels were screened to develop the nomogram and web-based survival rate calculator. The C-index of the nomogram in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts was 0.761, 0.758, and 0.768, respectively. The risk stratification model generated based on the nomogram effectively stratified patients into three distinct risk groups. K-M survival curves demonstrated that the novel risk stratification model exhibited a superior level of predictive accuracy compared to IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI both in training and two validation cohorts. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) value of the novel model (0.763) for predicting 5-year overall survival rates was higher than those of IPI (0.749), R-IPI (0.725), and NCCN-IPI (0.727) in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in both internal and external validation cohort.
conclusionsIn conclusion, we have successfully developed and validated a novel risk stratification model and a web-based survival rate calculator that demonstrated superior discriminative and predictive accuracy compared to IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI in the rituximab era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.