Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37861055›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Single patient learning for adaptive radiotherapy dose prediction.

Austen Maniscalco, Xiao Liang, Mu-Han Lin, Steve Jiang, Dan Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Austen ManiscalcoMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Xiao LiangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Mu-Han LinMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Steve JiangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Dan NguyenMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Funding

Human-like automated radiotherapy treatment planning via imitation learningR01CA254377 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN, JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Artificial Intelligence-Based Quality Assurance for Online Adaptive RadiotherapyR01CA258987 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Steve Bin Jiang, Dan Nguyen · 2022 to 2026
$2.8M
Intelligent treatment planning for cancer radiotherapyR01CA237269 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN, JIANG, STEVE BIN · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237269NCI NIH HHS R01 CA254377NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258987NIH HHS R01CA237269NIH HHS R01CA254377NIH HHS R01CA258987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThroughout a patient's course of radiation therapy, maintaining accuracy of their initial treatment plan over time is challenging due to anatomical changes-for example, stemming from patient weight loss or tumor shrinkage. Online adaptation of their RT plan to these changes is crucial, but hindered by manual and time-consuming processes. While deep learning (DL) based solutions have shown promise in streamlining adaptive radiation therapy (ART) workflows, they often require large and extensive datasets to train population-based models. PURPOSE: This study extends our prior research by introducing a minimalist approach to patient-specific adaptive dose prediction. In contrast to our prior method, which involved fine-tuning a pre-trained population model, this new method trains a model from scratch using only a patient's initial treatment data. This patient-specific dose predictor aims to enhance clinical accessibility, thereby empowering physicians and treatment planners to make more informed, quantitative decisions in ART. We hypothesize that patient-specific DL models will provide more accurate adaptive dose predictions for their respective patients compared to a population-based DL model.

methodsWe selected 33 patients to train an adaptive population-based (AP) model. Ten additional patients were selected, and their respective initial RT data served as single samples for training patient-specific (PS) models. These 10 patients contained an additional 26 ART plans that were withheld as the test dataset to evaluate AP versus PS model dose prediction performance. We assessed model performance using Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) by comparing predicted doses to the originally delivered ground truth doses. We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine statistically significant differences in terms of MAPE between the AP and PS model results across the test dataset. Furthermore, we calculated differences between predicted and ground truth mean doses for segmented structures and determined statistical significance in the differences for each of them.

resultsThe average MAPE across AP and PS model dose predictions was 5.759% and 4.069%, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test yielded two-tailed p-value =

conclusionOur study demonstrates the potential of patient-specific deep learning models in application to ART. Notably, our method streamlines the training process by minimizing the size of the required training dataset, as only a single patient's initial treatment data is required. External institutions considering the implementation of such a technology could package such a model so that it only requires the upload of a reference treatment plan for model training and deployment. Our single patient learning strategy demonstrates promise in ART due to its minimal dataset requirement and its utility in personalization of cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedadaptiveartificial intelligencedeep learningdose predictionhead and neck cancerpatientradiation therapysingle

Identifiers

PMID37861055
PMCPMC10843391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.