Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37861051›Full record

ReviewCNS & neurological disorders drug targets2024

Artificial Intelligence in The Management of Neurodegenerative Disorders.

Sanchit Dhankhar, Somdutt Mujwar, Nitika Garg, Samrat Chauhan, Monika Saini, Prerna Sharma, Suresh Kumar, Satish Kumar Sharma, Mohammad Amjad Kamal, Nidhi Rani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS & neurological disorders drug targets, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Role of Liposomes in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Unravelling the Microbiome's Role in Healing Diabetic Wounds.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sanchit DhankharChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Somdutt MujwarChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Nitika GargChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Samrat ChauhanChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Monika SainiMaharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana-133207, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Prerna SharmaGuru Gobind Singh College of Pharmacy, Yamunanagar-135001, Haryana, India.
Suresh KumarGanpati Institute of Pharmacy, Bilaspur-135102, Haryana, India.
Satish Kumar SharmaGlocal School of Pharmacy, The Glocal University, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mohammad Amjad KamalInstitutes for Systems Genetics, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China.
Nidhi RaniChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Chitkara University · INMaharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana · INGlocal University · INKing Abdulaziz University · SASichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative disorders are characterized by a gradual but irreversible loss of neurological function. The ability to detect and treat these conditions successfully is crucial for ensuring the best possible quality of life for people who suffer from them. The development of effective new methods for managing and treating neurodegenerative illnesses has been made possible by recent developments in computer technology. In this overview, we take a look at the prospects for applying computational approaches, such as drug design, AI, ML, and DL, to the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. To review the current state of the field, this article discusses the potential of computational methods for early disease detection, quantifying disease progression, and understanding the underlying biological mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases, as well as the challenges associated with these approaches and potential future directions. Moreover, it delves into the creation of computational models for the individualization of care for neurodegenerative diseases. The article concludes with suggestions for future studies and clinical applications, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of using computational techniques in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeurodegenerative DiseasesDisease ProgressionDrug DesignHumansAIAlzheimer'sComputational approachesdrug-designfrontotemporal dementia.Huntington'sneurodegenerative diseasesParkinson's

Identifiers

PMID37861051
OpenAlexW4387772117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.