Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37861013›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology2024

Sachin Kumar, Sandeep Kumar, Vineet Kumar Vishnoi, Pradeep Kumar, Dinesh Kumar Maheshwari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phytofabrication of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles UsingBioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2026
    Article
  2. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sachin KumarDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, 249404, Uttarakhand, India.
Sandeep KumarDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, 249404, Uttarakhand, India.
Vineet Kumar VishnoiDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, 249404, Uttarakhand, India.
Pradeep KumarDepartment of Botany, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, 226007, India.
Dinesh Kumar MaheshwariDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), Haridwar, 249404, Uttarakhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter a period of prolonged indifference, where synthetic drugs were preferred, interest in the biological aspects and bioactive ingredients of plants accountable for therapeutic potential has been explored eminently.

objectivesThe goal of this review is to elucidate indigenous knowledge parallelly with the pharmacotherapeutics potential of

methodsIn the current comprehensive study, web-based searches were performed by using several databases, such as Google Scholar, PubMed, ResearchGate, Science Direct, and Scopus, to figure out relevant research work and data published in academic journals from 1930 to July, 2023 using single or combination of keywords listed herewith.

resultsMore than 50 chemical constituents, including quinazoline and phenethylamine alkaloids, flavones, flavonol, phytosterol, fatty acids, etc., were reported to be found in different parts of healthy plants. Apart from traditional claims and pharmacological aspects, several marketed herbal formulations and granted patents were also described.

conclusionSeveral

Indexed as

EthnobotanyPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsAnimalsHumansPhytotherapyPhytochemicalsPlant Extractsbalabioactive markerscardioprotectiveperennial herb.phytochemical characterizationSida cordifolia L.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.