ArticleDigital health
Firefly-SVM predictive model for breast cancer subgroup classification with clinicopathological parameters.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretive machine learning predicts short-term mortality risk in elderly sepsis patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- AutoML-Driven Insights into Patient Outcomes and Emergency Care During Romania's First Wave of COVID-19.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is a highly predominant destructive disease among women characterised with varied tumour biology, molecular subgroups and diverse clinicopathological specifications. The potentiality of machine learning to transform complex medical data into meaningful knowledge has led to its application in breast cancer detection and prognostic evaluation. Objective: The emergence of data-driven diagnostic model for assisting clinicians in diagnostic decision making has gained an increasing curiosity in breast cancer identification and analysis. This motivated us to develop a breast cancer data-driven model for subtype classification more accurately. Method: In this article, we proposed a firefly-support vector machine (SVM) breast cancer predictive model that uses clinicopathological and demographic data gathered from various tertiary care cancer hospitals or oncological centres to distinguish between patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-triple-negative breast cancer (non-TNBC). Results: The results of the firefly-support vector machine (firefly-SVM) predictive model were distinguished from the traditional grid search-support vector machine (Grid-SVM) model, particle swarm optimisation-support vector machine (PSO-SVM) and genetic algorithm-support vector machine (GA-SVM) hybrid models through hyperparameter tuning. The findings show that the recommended firefly-SVM classification model outperformed other existing models in terms of prediction accuracy (93.4%, 86.6%, 69.6%) for automated SVM parameter selection. The effectiveness of the prediction model was also evaluated using well-known metrics, such as the F1-score, mean square error, area under the ROC curve, logarithmic loss and precision-recall curve. Conclusion: Firefly-SVM predictive model may be treated as an alternate tool for breast cancer subgroup classification that would benefit the clinicians for managing the patient with proper treatment and diagnostic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.