Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37860646›Full record

ArticleChemical science2023

A focus on computer vision for non-contact monitoring of catalyst degradation and product formation kinetics.

Niklaas J Buurma, Scott W Bagley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niklaas J BuurmaPhysical Organic Chemistry Centre, School of Chemistry, Cardiff University Main Building, Park Place Cardiff CF10 3AT UK buurma@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0260-5057
Scott W BagleyPfizer Medicine Design Eastern Point Road Groton CT 06340 USA scott.w.bagley@pfizer.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7365-7332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemists know the value of looking at a reaction for clues about reaction progress and success, but what-it-looks-like has never been quantified. Reid and co-workers (C. Yan, M. Cowie, C. Howcutt, K. M. P. Wheelhouse, N. S. Hodnett, M. Kollie, M. Gildea, M. H. Goodfellow and M. Reid,

Identifiers

PMID37860646
PMCPMC10583670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.