ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resorbable scaffolds for alveolar ridge augmentation procedures: A systematic review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Pooled it
- Bridging the missing middle in osseointegration: meso-scale topography between macro design and microroughness.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Understanding Polycaprolactone Degradation: Molecular Mechanisms and Implications for Biomedical Device Design.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Investigation into the Impact of Hollow Cylinder Inner Diameter on the Mechanical Properties of Biomimetic Voronoi Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparative assessment of the reaming characteristics of two different technologies for intramedullary bone graft harvesting.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Bone-Derived dECM Hydrogels Support Tunable Microenvironments for In Vitro Osteogenic Differentiation.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Advances in Composite Bioactive Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Repair: Implications for Oral Surgery.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Medical-Grade Polycaprolactone for 3D Printing: Mechanical, Chemical, and Biodegradation Characteristics.Polymers · 2025Article
- Influence of geometry, reinforcement, and sterilisation on the dimensional accuracy of additively manufactured carbon fibre-reinforced nylon composites.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biocompatible Thermoplastics in Additive Manufacturing of Bone Defect Fillers: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessing Cardiopulmonary Safety of Intramedullary Bone Graft Harvesting: A Comparative Study of the RIA 2 System and the ARA Concept.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
- Humanized In Vivo Bone Tissue Engineering: In Vitro Preculture Conditions Control the Structural, Cellular, and Matrix Composition of Humanized Bone Organs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Fabrication Strategies for Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering with Generative Design Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- An innovative intramedullary bone graft harvesting concept as a fundamental component of scaffold-guided bone regeneration: A preclinicalJournal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- In vivo study to assess fat embolism resulting from the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator 2 system compared to a novel aspirator-based concept for intramedullary bone graft harvesting.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D)-printed medical-grade polycaprolactone (mPCL) composite scaffolds have been the first to enable the concept of scaffold-guided bone regeneration (SGBR) from bench to bedside. However, advances in 3D printing technologies now promise next-generation scaffolds such as those with Voronoi tessellation. We hypothesized that the combination of a Voronoi design, applied for the first time to 3D-printed mPCL and ceramic fillers (here hydroxyapatite, HA), would allow slow degradation and high osteogenicity needed to regenerate bone tissue and enhance regenerative properties when mixed with xenograft material. We tested this hypothesis
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.