Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37860575›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

After the pandemic is before the pandemic: Rethinking urban priorities, assumptions and planning approaches.

Xincheng Zhu, Jiaxiang Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trends in Suicidal Mortality and Motives among Working-Ages Individuals in Japan during 2007-2022.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xincheng ZhuSchool of Planning, University College London, London, WC1H 0QB, UK.
Jiaxiang XuInstitute of Archaeology, Faculty of Social & Historical Sciences, University College London, London, WC1H 0QB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global covid-pandemic had significant impacts upon cities and city planning in the short, medium and longer term. Early severe disruptions to city living and working patterns prompted interventions from planners and the suspension of plans, largely based on projections of pre-pandemic data and trends. Longer term thinking has begun to settle into a pattern of reactions and approaches depending upon the characteristics of the city. This paper explores some of the responses to the pandemic and how cities are adapting and evolve towards a 'new normal' and what this might mean for planning and planners in future. Two questions are posed for future research following from this. First, will planners require new skills and knowledge going forward as cities adapt and evolve and, second, how can we better comprehend the full spectrum of responses and trajectories of city planning post-pandemic.

Indexed as

ChallengesCovid-19Post-pandemicUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID37860575
PMCPMC10582373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.