ArticleHeliyon2023
Usefulness of a drill stopper to prevent iatrogenic soft tissue injury in orthopedic surgery.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Usability and acceptability of a power tool with electronic depth gauge for orthopedic drilling - a preclinical randomized controlled trial in sawbones.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Trial
- Iatrogenic vascular injury during retrograde intramedullary nailing of a distal femur fracture: a case report.Journal of trauma and injury · 2025Article
- Safe and efficient drilling and completion technology for deep shale gas in Sichuan and Chongqing.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study introduces a novel technique utilizing a drill stopper to limit drill penetration depth and to prevent iatrogenic injuries, specifically neurovascular damage, in orthopedic surgeries. Orthopedic surgeries frequently involve the use of drills, which are essential tools for various procedures. However, improper handling of drills can lead to iatrogenic soft tissue injuries, causing severe consequences such as permanent disability or life-threatening complications. To address this issue, we propose the use of a drill stopper as a safeguard to prevent excessive drill penetration and reduce the risk of soft tissue damage during surgery. Materials and Methods: The study involved 32 orthopedic surgeons, half of whom were experienced and the other half inexperienced. Synthetic femur bone models (Synbone) were used for drilling exercises, employing four configurations: a sharp drill bit without a stopper (SF, Sharp Free), a sharp drill bit with a stopper (SS, Sharp Stopper), a blunt drill bit without a stopper (BF, Blunt Free), and a blunt drill bit with a stopper (BS, Blunt Stopper). Each participant conducted three trials for each configuration, and the penetration depth was measured after each trial. Results: For experienced surgeons, the average penetration depths were 3.83 (±1.826)mm for SF, 11.02 (±3.461)mm for BF, 2.88 (±0.334)mm for SS, and 2.75 (±0.601)mm for BS. In contrast, inexperienced surgeons had average depths of 8.52 (±4.608)mm for SF, 18.75 (±4.305)mm for BF, 2.96 (±0.683)mm for SS, and 2.83 (±0.724)mm for BS. Conclusion: The use of a drill stopper was highly effective in controlling drill penetration depth and preventing iatrogenic injuries during orthopedic surgeries. We recommend its incorporation, particularly when using a blunt drill bit or when an inexperienced surgeon operates in an anatomically unfamiliar area. Using the drill stopper, the risk of severe injuries from excessive drill penetration can be minimized, leading to improved patient safety and better surgical outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.