ArticleHeliyon2023
Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia on microarray gene expression data using categorical gradient boosted trees.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A selective machine learning algorithm for severe periodontitis labeling from questionnaire data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicles as biomarkers for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease staging using explainable artificial intelligence.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We define an iterative method for dimensionality reduction using categorical gradient boosted trees and Shapley values and created four machine learning models which potentially could be used as diagnostic tests for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). For the final Catboost model we use a dataset of 2177 individuals using as features 16 probe sets and the age in order to classify if someone has AML or is healthy. The dataset is multicentric and consists of data from 27 organizations, 25 cities, 15 countries and 4 continents. The performance of our last model is specificity: 0.9909, sensitivity: 0.9985, F1-score: 0.9976 and its ROC-AUC: 0.9962 using ten fold cross validation. On an inference dataset the perormance is: specificity: 0.9909, sensitivity: 0.9969, F1-score: 0.9969 and its ROC-AUC: 0.9939. To the best of our knowledge the performance of our model is the best one in the literature, as regards the diagnosis of AML using similar or not data. Moreover, there has not been any bibliographic reference which associates AML or any other type of cancer with the 16 probe sets we used as features in our final model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.