ArticleHeliyon2023
Prediction of neonatal death in pregnant women in an intensive care unit: Application of machine learning models.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and Validation of a PCA-Based Prediction Model for Preterm Infant Stunting Risk: A Retrospective Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: An Updated Systematic Review of Their Role in Obstetrics and Midwifery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Impact of Comprehensive Health Insurance affiliation on mortality in children under one year: an analysis of the Demographic and Health Survey 2010-2022 in Peru.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in maternal and child health: Current applications, translational gaps, and future research priorities.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal mortality remains a critical concern, particularly in developing countries. The advent of machine learning offers a promising avenue for predicting the survival of at-risk neonates. Further research is required to effectively deploy this approach within distinct clinical contexts. Methods: Conducted as an observational cross-sectional study, the research enrolled pregnant women receiving care in a level III national hospital's ICU in Peru. Detailed data encompassing maternal diagnosis, maternal characteristics, obstetric characteristics, and newborn outcomes (survival or demise) were meticulously collected. Employing machine learning, predictive models were developed for neonatal mortality. Estimations of beta coefficients in the training dataset informed the model application to the validation dataset. Results: A cohort of 280 pregnant women in the ICU were included in this study. The Gradient Boosting approach was selected following rigorous experimentation with diverse model types due to its superior F1-score, ROC curve performance, computational efficiency, and learning rate. The final model incorporated variables deemed pertinent to its efficacy, including gestational age, eclampsia, kidney infection, maternal age, previous placenta complications accompanied by hemorrhage, severe preeclampsia, number of prenatal checkups, and history of miscarriages. By incorporating optimized hyperparameter values, the model exhibited an impressive area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.95-1), along with a sensitivity of 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.94-1) and specificity of 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.93-1). Conclusion: The findings underscore the utility of machine learning models, specifically Gradient Boosting, in foreseeing neonatal mortality among pregnant women admitted to the ICU, even when confronted with maternal morbidities. This insight can enhance clinical decision-making and ultimately reduce neonatal mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.