Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37860289›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in biomedical engineering2023

Sensory Restoration for Improved Motor Control of Prostheses.

Lee E Fisher, Robert A Gaunt, He Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lee E FisherRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Robert A GauntRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
He HuangUNC/NC State Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

Funding

A Biomimetic Approach Towards a Dexterous NeuroprosthesisUH3NS107714 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BONINGER, MICHAEL L. · 2018 to 2023
$7.1M
Influence of Task Complexity and Sensory Feedback on Cortical Control of Grasp ForceU01NS123125 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COLLINGER, JENNIFER L. · 2021 to 2025
$5.5M
The effect of spinal cord stimulation on spinal reflex gain and dorsal column sensory pathway and their correlation with phantom limb painUH3NS100541 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FISHER, LEE E, WEBER, DOUGLAS J · 2017 to 2022
$4.6M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS123125NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS100541NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS107714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatosensory neuroprostheses are devices with the potential to restore the senses of touch and movement from prosthetic limbs for people with limb amputation or paralysis. By electrically stimulating the peripheral or central nervous system, these devices evoke sensations that appear to emanate from the missing or insensate limb, and when paired with sensors on the prosthesis, they can improve the functionality and embodiment of the prosthesis. There have been major advances in the design of these systems over the past decade, although several important steps remain before they can achieve widespread clinical adoption outside the lab setting. Here, we provide a brief overview of somatosensory neuroprostheses and explores these hurdles and potential next steps towards clinical translation.

Identifiers

PMID37860289
PMCPMC10583965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.