Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37860249›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Importance of controlling mesocotyl elongation in the development of rice seedlings intended for mechanical transplantation.

Yuanli Jia, Tao Wang, Gaozi Zhou, Lei Tang, Xueping Yue, Xinrui Liu, Tao Cao, Juan Yang, Youfeng Tao, Fei Deng and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuanli JiaCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Tao WangCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Gaozi ZhouCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Lei TangCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xueping YueCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xinrui LiuCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Tao CaoCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Juan YangCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Youfeng TaoCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Fei DengCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Wei ZhouCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Wanjun RenCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yong ChenCrop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mesocotyl facilities the emergence of deep-sown rice. However, the effects of mesocotyl elongation on mechanically transplanted rice seedlings remain unclear. In this study, the indica three-line hybrid rice Chuanyou 6709 (CY6709) and the indica conventional rice Guichao II (GCII) were selected as experimental materials. The seedlings were grouped based on mesocotyl lengths of 1.0 and 2.0 cm (M1 and M2, respectively), and seedlings without mesocotyl elongation were used as a control (M0). Seedling morphology, root morphology and physiology, and dynamic changes in soluble sugar and protein, malondialdehyde (MDA), and antioxidant enzyme activity in the mesocotyl were evaluated. The results showed that the elongation of mesocotyl is not conducive to improving the quality of mechanically transplanted seedlings, resulting in weak seedlings and poor root coiling force. The mesocotyl lengths of the seedlings showed a single peak with increasing seedling age, which gradually disappeared. The longer the mesocotyls, the slower their senescence. The MDA content of M2 was significantly lower than that of M1, and the activities of soluble sugar, soluble protein, and antioxidant enzymes of M2 were higher than those of M1, implying that seedlings with longer mesocotyls yielded lower-quality seedlings, reducing their suitability for mechanized transplantation. Compared with those of M0, the root-shoot ratio, stem base width, leaf age, leaf area, white root number, root coiling force, root length, root surface area, and root volume of M1 and M2 were reduced. Therefore, in the raising of rice seedlings, excessive elongation of the rice mesocotyl is not conducive to optimum root growth and development of aboveground structures for seedlings that are suitable for mechanized transplantation. Controlling the mesocotyl elongation can facilitate the cultivation of high-quality mechanically transplanted seedlings.

Indexed as

mechanically transplanted ricerice mesocotylroot coiling forceroot morphologyseedling quality

Identifiers

PMID37860249
PMCPMC10582980
OpenAlexW4387341703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.