Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37860161›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Comparison of the responses of cross-sectional web- and paper-based surveys on lifestyle behaviors of Japanese adolescents.

Yuichiro Otsuka, Aya Kinjo, Yoshitaka Kaneita, Osamu Itani, Yuki Kuwabara, Ruriko Minobe, Hitoshi Maesato, Susumu Higuchi, Hideyuki Kanda, Hisashi Yoshimoto and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yuichiro OtsukaDivision of Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabasi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.
Aya KinjoDivision of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago-city, Tottori 683-8503, Japan.
Yoshitaka KaneitaDivision of Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabasi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.
Osamu ItaniDivision of Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Oyaguchi-kamimachi, Itabasi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.
Yuki KuwabaraDivision of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago-city, Tottori 683-8503, Japan.
Ruriko MinobeNational Hospital Organization Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Yokosuka-city, Kanagawa 239-0841, Japan.
Hitoshi MaesatoNational Hospital Organization Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Yokosuka-city, Kanagawa 239-0841, Japan.
Susumu HiguchiNational Hospital Organization Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Yokosuka-city, Kanagawa 239-0841, Japan.
Hideyuki KandaDepartment of Public Health, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama-city, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Hisashi YoshimotoDepartment of Family Medicine, General Practice and Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.
Maki JikeDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Life and Environmental Science, Showa Women's University, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 154-8533, Japan.
Hideaki KasugaDepartment of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fuksushima-city, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Teruna ItoDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Koriyama Women's University, Koriyama-city, Fukushima 963-8503, Japan.
Yoneatsu OsakiDivision of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago-city, Tottori 683-8503, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In Japan, paper-based surveys are currently more effective than web-based surveys. This study compared the response rates and lifestyle behaviors between paper- and web-based surveys conducted among Japanese junior and senior high schools. Methods: In total, there were 42 and 64 junior and senior high schools, respectively, for the web-based surveys and 20 and 27 junior and senior high schools, respectively, for the paper-based surveys. The questionnaire covered lifestyle behaviors (e.g., alcohol consumption, smoking, exercise, eating, and sleep status), mental health, and plans to attend college. School- and student-level response rates by survey method were assessed, and so was the effect on the reporting of each lifestyle behavior using logistic regression models. Results: The school response rates were 16.0% and 38.3% for web- and paper-based surveys, respectively. The student response rates were 88.7% and 77.2%, respectively. The web-based group had significantly more female participants and lower response rates for higher grades in senior high schools. The odds of lifetime and current alcohol consumption and poor mental health were lower, whereas those of lifetime use of conventional cigarettes, shorter sleep duration, and plans to continue attending college were higher among web-based (vs. paper-based) participants. Conclusions: The school response rate was poor in the web-based survey. However, whether the differences in lifestyle behavior are attributed to selection bias or the survey method remains unclear.

Indexed as

AdolescentAlcoholJapanPaper-based surveyResponse rateSmokingWeb-based survey

Identifiers

PMID37860161
PMCPMC10583168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.