Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37860143›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2023

Response surface methodology-optimized extraction of flavonoids from pomelo peels and isolation of naringin with antioxidant activities by Sephadex LH20 gel chromatography.

Yuchen Shangguan, Jing Ni, Lili Jiang, Yang Hu, Chuanbo He, Ying Ma, Guohong Wu, Hejian Xiong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuchen ShangguanCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Fujian Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Marine Functional Food, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Jing NiFisheries College of Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Lili JiangXiamen Municipal Southern Ocean Testing Co., L, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Yang HuCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Fujian Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Marine Functional Food, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Chuanbo HeCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Fujian Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Marine Functional Food, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Ying MaFisheries College of Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Guohong WuCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Fujian Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Marine Functional Food, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Hejian XiongCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Fujian Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Marine Functional Food, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, China.
Jimei University · CNXiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, flavonoids were extracted from pomelo peels and naringin was isolated from the flavonoid extract. The effects of extraction parameters, namely, ethanol concentration, solid-to-liquid ratio, and extraction time, on the yield of flavonoids extracted from pomelo peels were analyzed according to the Box-Behnken design of response surface methodology. The experimental conditions for flavonoid extraction were optimized, and naringin was separated from the extracted flavonoids using Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography. Experimental results showed that the influence of factors on the extraction rate of flavonoids from pomelo peels was in the order of ethanol concentration > solid-to-liquid ratio > extraction time, and the optimal extraction parameters were 85% ethanol concentration, 1:20 solid-to-liquid ratio, and 4-h extraction time for extracting flavonoids from pomelo peels. Under these conditions, the yield of flavonoids was 6.07 ± 0.06 mg/g. After three times of extraction, the flavonoid extraction rate reached 96.55%, and the residual naringin in the pomelo peels was 0.017 mg/g, at which point the bitterness in the pomelo peels disappeared. Two components, namely, PF1 and PF2, were separated from the crude flavonoid of pomelo peels through Sephadex LH20 column chromatography. PF2 was identified as naringin by high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, with a purity of 95.7 ± 0.23%. Both flavonoids and PF2 exhibited good in vitro radicals scavenging activities on DPPH, ABTS, superoxide anion and hydroxyl.

Indexed as

DebitteringFlavonoidsPomelo peelsResponse surface methodologySephadex LH-20

Identifiers

PMID37860143
PMCPMC10582393
OpenAlexW4387378521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.