Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37860057›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2023

Sync for Genes Phase 5: Computable artifacts for sharing dynamically annotated FHIR-formatted genomic variants.

Robert Dolin, Bret S E Heale, Rohan Gupta, Carla Alvarez, Justin Aronson, Aziz Boxwala, Shaileshbhai R Gothi, Ammar Husami, James Shalaby, Lawrence Babb and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Robert DolinElimu Informatics El Cerrito California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6235-6964
Bret S E HealeHumanized Health Consulting Salt Lake City Utah USA.
Rohan GuptaShri Mata Vaishno Devi University Katra India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-8629
Carla AlvarezElimu Informatics El Cerrito California USA.
Justin AronsonNorthwestern University Evanston Illinois USA.
Aziz BoxwalaElimu Informatics El Cerrito California USA.
Shaileshbhai R GothiUniversity of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.
Ammar HusamiCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio USA.
James ShalabyElimu Informatics El Cerrito California USA.
Lawrence BabbMedical and Population Genetics Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard Cambridge Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-2227
Alex WagnerNationwide Children's Hospital/OSU Columbus Ohio USA.
Srikar ChamalaUSC/Children's Hospital Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.

Funding

Development and validation of a computable knowledge framework for genomic medicineR35HG011949 · NHGRI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI WAGNER, ALEX HANDLER · 2021 to 2025
$2.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R35 HG011949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Variant annotation is a critical component in next-generation sequencing, enabling a sequencing lab to comb through a sea of variants in order to hone in on those likely to be most significant, and providing clinicians with necessary context for decision-making. But with the rapid evolution of genomics knowledge, reported annotations can quickly become out-of-date. Under the ONC Sync for Genes program, our team sought to standardize the sharing of dynamically annotated variants (e.g., variants annotated on demand, based on current knowledge). The computable biomedical knowledge artifacts that were developed enable a clinical decision support (CDS) application to surface up-to-date annotations to clinicians. Methods: The work reported in this article relies on the Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Genomics and Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) Variant Annotation (VA) standards. We developed a CDS pipeline that dynamically annotates patient's variants through an intersection with current knowledge and serves up the FHIR-encoded variants and annotations (diagnostic and therapeutic implications, molecular consequences, population allele frequencies) via FHIR Genomics Operations. ClinVar, CIViC, and PharmGKB were used as knowledge sources, encoded as per the GA4GH VA specification. Results: Primary public artifacts from this project include a GitHub repository with all source code, a Swagger interface that allows anyone to visualize and interact with the code using only a web browser, and a backend database where all (synthetic and anonymized) patient data and knowledge are housed. Conclusions: We found that variant annotation varies in complexity based on the variant type, and that various bioinformatics strategies can greatly improve automated annotation fidelity. More importantly, we demonstrated the feasibility of an ecosystem where genomic knowledge bases have standardized knowledge (e.g., based on the GA4GH VA spec), and CDS applications can dynamically leverage that knowledge to provide real-time decision support, based on current knowledge, to clinicians at the point of care.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportEHRgenomics

Identifiers

PMID37860057
PMCPMC10582236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.