ArticleLearning health systems2023
An application of computable biomedical knowledge to transform patient centered scheduling.
Article in Learning health systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-Driven Leadership in Internal Medicine Clinics: A DES-DOE Framework for Optimizing Patient Flow and Turnaround Time.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- An application of computable biomedical knowledge to transform patient centered scheduling.Learning health systems · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Efficient appointment scheduling in the outpatient setting is challenged by two main factors: variability and uncertainty leading to undesirable wait times for patients or physician overtime, and events such as no-shows, cancellations, or walk-ins can result in physician idle time and under-utilization of resources. Some methods have been developed to optimize scheduling and minimize wait and idle times in the inpatient setting but are limited in the outpatient setting. Methods: People and Organization Development, an internal group of organizational developers, led the development of a solution that selects the optimal group of appointments for a patient that minimizes the time between associated procedures as well as lead time built using a linear integer program. This program takes appointment requests, availability of resources, order constraints, and time preferences as inputs, and provides a list of the most optimal groupings as an output. Included in the methodology is the technical infrastructure necessary to deploy this within an electronic medical record system. Implementation and Test Plan: A pilot has been designed to run this algorithm in a single department. The pilot will include training staff on the new workflow, and conducting informal interviews to gather qualitative data on performance. Key performance indicators such as schedule utilization, resource idle time, patient satisfaction, average appointment lead time, and average waiting time will be closely monitored. Discussion: The model is limited in accounting for variability in appointment length potentially resulting in inaccurate schedules for healthcare providers and patients. Future states would incorporate certain visit types starting through machine learning techniques. Additionally expanding our data pipeline and processing, developing greater communication software, and expanding our research to include other departments and subspecialties, will enhance the accuracy and flexibility of the algorithm and enable healthcare providers to provide better care to their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.