Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37859954›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2023

A comparative study on the antifungal effect of potassium sorbate, chitosan, and nano-chitosan against

Shimaa S Awaad, Marwa A Sherief, Sahar M Mousa, A Orabi, Ayah B Abdel-Salam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shimaa S AwaadDepartment of Food Hygiene and Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Marwa A SheriefInorganic Chemistry Department, Advanced Materials Technology and Mineral Resources Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Sahar M MousaInorganic Chemistry Department, Advanced Materials Technology and Mineral Resources Research Institute, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
A OrabiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Ayah B Abdel-SalamDepartment of Food Hygiene and Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Yeasts are common contaminants in the cheese industry, which frequently arise from raw milk, the surrounding environment, and equipment, resulting in economic losses in addition to health hazards. This study aimed to compare the antifungal effect of chitosan and nano-chitosan as natural preservatives with a commonly used chemical preservative (potassium sorbate) against Materials and Methods: Laboratory Karish cheese was manufactured with the addition of potassium sorbate, chitosan, nano-chitosan, and their combinations at different concentrations. The survival of Results: There was a significant decrease in the count of yeasts in all treatments from the 3 Conclusion: Potassium sorbate, chitosan, and ChNPs are effective antifungal preservatives against

Indexed as

CandidachitosanKarish cheesenano-chitosanpotassium sorbateRhodotorula

Identifiers

PMID37859954
PMCPMC10583870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.