ReviewVeterinary world2023
Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing
Review in Veterinary world, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Molecular detection of CTX-M ESBL-encoding genes inOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Comparative effects ofVeterinary world · 2026Article
- Molecular detection of CTX-M gene from ducks sold in traditional markets in Surabaya, Indonesia.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Escherichia coli in Pet Cats and Dogs in Central Peninsular Malaysia.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Ecological and public health dimensions of ESBL-producingVeterinary world · 2025Review
- Dissemination and phenotypic characterization of ESBL-producingOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Phylogenetic analysisOpen veterinary journal · 2024Article
- Characterization of Extraintestinal PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional study of antibiotic resistance toVeterinary world · 2024Article
- Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producingVeterinary world · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Materials and Methods: Samples of cat rectal swabs were cultured in Brilliant Green Bile Lactose Broth medium and then streaked on eosin methylene blue agar medium for bacterial isolation, whereas Gram-staining and IMViC tests were conducted to confirm the identification results. The Kirby-Bauer diffusion test was used to determine antibiotic sensitivity, and the double-disk synergy test was used to determine ESBL-producing bacteria. Molecular detection of the genes Results: Based on morphological culture, Gram-staining, and biochemical testing, the results of sample inspection showed that of the 100 cat rectal swab samples isolated, 71 (71%) were positive for Conclusion: In conclusion, pet owners must be educated on the use of antibiotics to improve their knowledge about the risks of antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.