ArticleVeterinary world2023
Epidemiological study of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in healthy free-ranging bantengs (
Article in Veterinary world, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Wildlife-Livestock Interface as a Bidirectional Pathway for the Spread of ESBL-ProducingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Major Causative Bacteria of Dairy Cow Mastitis in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, 2015-2024: An Epidemiologic Survey and Analysis.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Enterobacterales Producing ESBLs and AmpC in Fresh Vegetables from Tebessa City, Algeria.Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms (ARMs) have been increasing among wild animals. Interactions occurring at the interface between wildlife, humans, and livestock can lead to the transmission of ARMs. Thus, the prevalence of ARMs in wild and domestic animals should be determined to address and prevent this issue. This study aimed to determine the resistance patterns of cefotaxime (CTX)-resistant Materials and Methods: Forty-five fecal samples were taken from wild bantengs inhabiting the Lam Pao non-hunting area in Thailand, alongside 15 samples from domestic cattle. Bacterial culture, triple sugar iron, and motile indole lysine tests were conducted to identify Results: All samples tested positive for Conclusion: Despite no previous antibiotic applications, approximately one-third of the banteng samples displayed CTX resistance, indicating ARM contamination within the ecosystem. The similarity in ESBL genes between the banteng and domestic cattle populations suggests potential gene transmissions between these animal groups. However, the initial source of ARMs remains unclear, as the banteng population exhibited more ESBL genes than the domestic cattle, suggesting the possibility of multiple ARM sources. These findings raise concerns because the banteng population inhabits an area that is an important source of freshwater and nourishes the entire north-east region of Thailand and other South-east Asian countries, including Laos, Cambodia, and Southern Vietnam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.