ReviewCureus2023
Comparison of Pharmacological Therapies in Relapse Rates in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient‑Reported Satisfaction in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Advantages of At‑Home Self‑Administered Subcutaneous Ofatumumab Versus Other High‑Efficacy Therapies.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Data-driven hypothesis discovery from disease trajectories in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Genetic Contribution to Medium-Term Disease Activity in Multiple Sclerosis.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune neurological disorder that significantly impacts the central nervous system (CNS), which includes the brain and spinal cord. Approximately 2.8 million individuals are believed to be living with MS worldwide. The management of MS has evolved considerably over the years, offering a multitude of guidelines, diverse treatment options, and different approaches to signs and symptoms. The present systematic literature review serves as a comprehensive analysis of the current therapeutic options for MS. It provides a thorough literature review of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs comparing their various clinical end points while concurrently assessing their risk-benefit ratio. It also provides an extensive review of current guidelines and offers an in-depth examination of the different approaches to MS. Through this multifaceted approach, this paper facilitates easy access to available treatment options and aims to aid healthcare providers in decision-making as well as providing a foundation for future research aimed at enhancing treatment options for MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.