Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37859795›Full record

ArticleBiofilm2023

Effect of anode material and dispersal limitation on the performance and biofilm community in microbial electrolysis cells.

Marie Abadikhah, Ming Liu, Frank Persson, Britt-Marie Wilén, Anne Farewell, Jie Sun, Oskar Modin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofilm, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie AbadikhahWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ming LiuKey Laboratory of Optoelectronics Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China.
Frank PerssonWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Britt-Marie WilénWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anne FarewellChemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jie SunCollege of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University, and Fujian Science and Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China, Fuzhou, 350100, China.
Oskar ModinWater Environment Technology, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Chalmers University of Technology · SEBeijing University of Technology · CNTan Kah Kee Innovation Laboratory · CNUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC), the oxidization of organic compounds is facilitated by an electrogenic biofilm on the anode surface. The biofilm community composition determines the function of the system. Both deterministic and stochastic factors affect the community, but the relative importance of different factors is poorly understood. Anode material is a deterministic factor as materials with different properties may select for different microorganisms. Ecological drift is a stochastic factor, which is amplified by dispersal limitation between communities. Here, we compared the effects of three anode materials (graphene, carbon cloth, and nickel) with the effect of dispersal limitation on the function and biofilm community assembly. Twelve MECs were operated for 56 days in four hydraulically connected loops and shotgun metagenomic sequencing was used to analyse the microbial community composition on the anode surfaces at the end of the experiment. The anode material was the most important factor affecting the performance of the MECs, explaining 54-80 % of the variance observed in peak current density, total electric charge generation, and start-up lag time, while dispersal limitation explained 10-16 % of the variance. Carbon cloth anodes had the highest current generation and shortest lag time. However, dispersal limitation was the most important factor affecting microbial community structure, explaining 61-98 % of the variance in community diversity, evenness, and the relative abundance of the most abundant taxa, while anode material explained 0-20 % of the variance. The biofilms contained nine

Indexed as

BioanodeBioelectrochemical systemGrapheneMetagenomicsMicrobial community assembly

Identifiers

PMID37859795
PMCPMC10582064
OpenAlexW4387491504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.