ArticlePopulation research and policy review2023
National Couples' Health and Time Study: Sample, Design, and Weighting.
Article in Population research and policy review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portraying Mixed-Agenda Couples: Insights From Large-Scale Data Sets.Journal of marital and family therapy · 2026Article
- Self-rated health and inflammation: Associations among partnered sexual minority and heterosexual adults.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026Article
- Sexual minority adults exhibit greater inflammation than heterosexual adults in the context of depressive symptoms and anxiety: Pathways to health disparities.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2026Article
- Assessing Inflammatory Biomarkers at the Intersection of Marijuana and PrEP Use: Preliminary Findings From the NCHAT-BIO Study.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Article
- Half of the Picture: A Research Note on Measuring the Sexual Identity Composition of Couples.Demography · 2025Article
- Within-partner concordance of hypertension and overweight/obesity among sexual minority couples.Annals of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Sexual minority stress and epigenetic aging.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2025Article
- LGBTQ+ identity and its association with inflammation and cellular immune function.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2025Article
- Health Care Stereotype Threat During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals.American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Marginalized Identities, Healthcare Discrimination, and Parental Stress about COVID-19.Journal of marriage and the family · 2025Article
- Family Planning and Concerns of Unfair Treatment of (Potential) Children Among Partnered Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals.LGBTQ+ family : an interdisciplinary journal · 2025Article
- Different-sex American couples' stress, uncertainty, and fertility desires during the COVID-19 pandemic.Genus · 2025Article
- Suicidal ideation among partnered U.S. adults by sexual identity: Emerging Ideas.Family relations · 2024Article
- Coping Patterns During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Sexual and Gender Identity.Journal of homosexuality · 2024Article
- State-Level LGBTQ + Policies and Experiences of Interpersonal Discrimination among Sexual and Gender Minority People.Population research and policy review · 2024Article
- Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.Journal of marriage and the family · 2024Article
- Article
- Racial Discrimination and Mental Health among Asian Americans during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Sociology of race and ethnicity (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Article
- National Couples' Health and Time Study: Sample, Design, and Weighting.Population research and policy review · 2023Article
- Emotional support among partnered sexual minority and heterosexual individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.Social science research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Couples' Health and Time Study (NCHAT) is the first fully powered, population-representative study of couples in America containing large samples of sexual, gender, and racial and ethnic diverse individuals. Drawn from the Gallup Panel and the Gallup Recontact Sample, when weighted, the data are population representative of individuals in the United States who (1) are married or cohabiting, (2) are between 20 and 60, (3) speak English or Spanish, and (4) have internet access. The data were collected between September 2020 and April 2021 in the midst of a global pandemic as well as racial and political upheaval. NCHAT includes surveys of 3,642 main respondents and 1,515 partners along with time diaries. We describe the sampling process, challenges weighting a diverse population-representative samples, and sociodemographic characteristics of the NCHAT study. These data will provide opportunities for new research on the health and well-being of American families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.