Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37859750›Full record

ArticleGeneral psychiatry2023

Development of the Life Gatekeeper suicide prevention training programme in China: a Delphi study.

Chengxi Cai, Chen Yin, Yongsheng Tong, Diyang Qu, Yunzhi Ding, Daixi Ren, Peiyu Chen, Yi Yin, Jing An, Runsen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in General psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chengxi CaiVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Chen YinVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yongsheng TongBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Diyang QuVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yunzhi DingVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Daixi RenVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Peiyu ChenVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yi YinBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing AnBeijing Huilongguan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Runsen ChenVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-8725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Youth suicide has been a pressing public mental health concern in China, yet there is a lack of gatekeeper intervention programmes developed locally to prevent suicide among Chinese adolescents. Aims: The current Delphi study was the first step in the systematic development of the Life Gatekeeper programme, the first gatekeeper programme to be developed locally in China that aims to equip teachers and parents with the knowledge, skills and ability to identify and intervene with students at high risk of suicide. Methods: The Delphi method was used to elicit a consensus of experts who were invited to evaluate the importance of training content, the feasibility of the training delivery method, the possibility of achieving the training goals and, finally, the appropriateness of the training materials. Two Delphi rounds were conducted among local experts with diversified professional backgrounds in suicide research and practice. Statements were accepted for inclusion in the adjusted training programme if they were endorsed by at least 80% of the panel. Results: Consensus was achieved on 201 out of 207 statements for inclusion into the adapted guidelines for the gatekeeper programme, with 151 from the original questionnaire and 50 generated from comments of the panel members. These endorsed statements were synthesised to develop the content of the Life Gatekeeper training programme. Conclusions: This Delphi study provided an evidence base for developing the first gatekeeper training programme systematically and locally in China. We hope that the current study can pave the way for more evidence-based suicide prevention programmes in China. Further study is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of the Life Gatekeeper training programme.

Indexed as

Crisis InterventionPsychology, AdolescentSuicide

Identifiers

PMID37859750
PMCPMC10582848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.