ReviewTranslational cancer research2023
Artificial intelligence applications in computed tomography in gastric cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Translational cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion in Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Radiomics.Cancers · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via a deep learning model with whole-slide images.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a revolutionary technique which is deeply impacting and reshaping clinical practice in oncology. This review aims to summarize the current status of the clinical application of AI-based computed tomography (CT) for gastric cancer (GC), focusing on diagnosis, genetic status detection and risk prediction of metastasis, prognosis and treatment efficacy. The challenges and prospects for future research will also be discussed. Methods: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database to identify clinical studies published between 1990 and November 2022 that investigated AI applications in CT in GC. The major findings of the verified studies were summarized. Key Content and Findings: AI applications in CT images have attracted considerable attention in various fields such as diagnosis, prediction of metastasis risk, survival, and treatment response. These emerging techniques have shown a high potential to outperform clinicians in diagnostic accuracy and time-saving. Conclusions: AI-powered tools showed great potential to increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce radiologists' workload. However, the goal of AI is not to replace human ability but to help oncologists make decisions in their practice. Therefore, radiologists should play a predominant role in AI applications and decide the best ways to integrate these complementary techniques within clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.