ArticleNature machine intelligence2022
Deep neural networks with controlled variable selection for the identification of putative causal genetic variants.
Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Harnessing Machine Learning, a Subset of Artificial Intelligence, for Early Detection and Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Interpretable deep neural network identifies robust biomarkers for diseases with mechanistic insights from omics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Exploring the use of machine and deep learning in genome-wide association studies: a comprehensive review.BioData mining · 2026Review
- Interpreting artificial neural networks to detect genome-wide association signals for complex traits.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Multi-task genomic prediction using gated residual variable selection neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A quantitative benchmark of neural network feature selection methods for detecting nonlinear signals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Phenotype prediction using biologically interpretable neural networks on multi-cohort multi-omics data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Designing interpretable deep learning applications for functional genomics: a quantitative analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence for nailfold capillaroscopy analyses - a proof of concept application in juvenile dermatomyositis.Pediatric research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been successfully utilized in many scientific problems for their high prediction accuracy, but their application to genetic studies remains challenging due to their poor interpretability. Here we consider the problem of scalable, robust variable selection in DNNs for the identification of putative causal genetic variants in genome sequencing studies. We identified a pronounced randomness in feature selection in DNNs due to its stochastic nature, which may hinder interpretability and give rise to misleading results. We propose an interpretable neural network model, stabilized using ensembling, with controlled variable selection for genetic studies. The merit of the proposed method includes: flexible modelling of the nonlinear effect of genetic variants to improve statistical power; multiple knockoffs in the input layer to rigorously control the false discovery rate; hierarchical layers to substantially reduce the number of weight parameters and activations, and improve computational efficiency; and stabilized feature selection to reduce the randomness in identified signals. We evaluate the proposed method in extensive simulation studies and apply it to the analysis of Alzheimer's disease genetics. We show that the proposed method, when compared with conventional linear and nonlinear methods, can lead to substantially more discoveries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.