Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37859682›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Effect of optimized thrombus aspiration on myocardial perfusion and prognosis in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Boning Xu, Chunxin Zhang, Wei Wei, Yun Zhan, Mingguo Yang, Yanjun Wang, Jiajian Zhao, Guiyang Lin, Wen-Wen Zhang, Xing Huo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boning XuCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Chunxin ZhangCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Wei WeiCath Lab, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Yun ZhanCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Mingguo YangCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Yanjun WangCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Jiajian ZhaoCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Guiyang LinCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Wen-Wen ZhangCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Xing HuoCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Bin ShiCardiovascular Department, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
Ling FanCath Lab, The Fifth Clinical College of China Medical University-Bengang General Hospital of China Resources Medical Group, Benxi, China.
China Resources (China) · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of optimized thrombus aspiration on myocardial perfusion, prognosis, and safety in patients with acute ST Methods: A total of 129 patients with STEMI were randomly allocated into control group (Subgroup A and B) and experimental group(Subgroup C and D). Control group received percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA),thrombus aspiration and primary PCI. Experimental group received optimized thrombus aspiration and primary PCI. The number of thrombus aspiration was less than 4 times in Subgroup A and C. The number of thrombus aspiration was performed more than 4 times in Subgroups B and D. The classification of thrombi extracted, the TIMI flow grade, the incidence of no-reflow and slow flow, cTFC, TPI and CK-MB at 12 h and 24 h after stenting, ST segment resolution of ECG after stenting, NT-proBNP, LVEFat 24 h, 30 days and 180 days after stenting were compared between groups. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding complications, stroke events and major cardiovascular events (MACE) were recorded and compared between groups. Results: The classification of thrombi extracted in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group. The TIMI flow grade of the experimental group was better than the control group after thrombus aspiration. After stenting, the advantage still existed, but the difference was not statistically significant. On cTFC, the experimental group was lower than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant; After stenting the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group. The CK-MB at 12 h and 24 h of the experimental group was lower than the control group. After thrombus aspiration the incidence of no-reflow in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group; after stenting the incidence of no-reflow in the experimental group was still lower than the control group, but no statistically difference. After thrombus aspiration and stenting the incidence of slow flow in the experimental group were lower than that in the control group. After stenting, NT-proBNP at 24 h was lower in the experimental group than that in the control group, However, there was no statistical difference; after stenting, The NT-proBNP in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group at 30 days and 180 days. After stenting, LVEF of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group at 24 h and 30 days; superiority remained after 180 days but no statistical difference. There was no statistical difference between two groups for intraoperative and postoperative bleeding complications, stroke events, and MACE events. In Subgroup analysis,there was no significant difference in the classification of thrombi extracted, TIMI flow grade, cTFC, CK-MB,NT-proBNP and LVEF between group C and D, but group A was better than group B. Analysis of variance showed that the optimal number of suction was 4-5 times. Conclusions: Optimized thrombus aspiration can significantly improve myocardial perfusion and short-term and medium-term prognosis of STEMI patients after PCI, and reduce the incidence of slow flow and no-reflow. The optimal suction times were 4-5 times. Traditional aspiration method with more aspiration times is harmful to cardiac prognosis. Thrombus aspiration does not increase the incidence of stroke events and is safe.

Indexed as

infarct-related arterymicrocirculation disturbancemyocardial perfusionoptimized thrombus aspirationST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID37859682
PMCPMC10584146
OpenAlexW4387343343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.