Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37859629›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602023

Vedolizumab in Mild-to-Moderate Crohn's Disease Patients Naïve to Biological Therapy: A Multicentric Observational Study.

Adriana Zanoni Dotti, Daniela Oliveira Magro, Eduardo Garcia Vilela, Julio Maria Fonseca Chebli, Liliana Andrade Chebli, Flavio Steinwurz, Marjorie Argollo, Nayara Salgado Carvalho, Jose Miguel Luz Parente, Murilo Moura Lima and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Adriana Zanoni DottiHospital de Clínicas das UFPR, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-9135
Daniela Oliveira MagroUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-6254
Eduardo Garcia VilelaFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5443-7553
Julio Maria Fonseca ChebliUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-0663
Liliana Andrade ChebliUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7875-1475
Flavio SteinwurzHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-9766
Marjorie ArgolloHospital São Luiz (Rede D'or), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-8861
Nayara Salgado CarvalhoHospital São Luiz (Rede D'or), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9167-8957
Jose Miguel Luz ParenteUniversidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Murilo Moura LimaUniversidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Rogério Serafim ParraHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5566-9284
Ramir Luan PerinUniversidade de Passo Fundo (UPF), Passo Fundo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8586-4611
Cristina FloresInstituto do Aparelho Digestivo (IAD), Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1623-4525
Eloá Marussi MorsolettoHospital São Vicente, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9204-2651
Sandro da Costa FerreiraHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-6599
Juliano Coelho LudvigClínica LUDVIG/ ESADI, Blumenau, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-6958
Roberto Luiz Kaiser JuniorKaiser Clínica, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-1255
Mikaell Alexandre Gouvea FariaKaiser Clínica, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-0306
Guilherme Mattioli NicollelliHospital de Clínicas das UFPR, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-2826
Adriana Ribas AndradeUniversidade Estadual da Bahia (UNEB), Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6012-2155
Natalia Sousa Freitas QueirozHospital Santa Cruz, Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2857-0825
Paulo Gustavo KotzePontificia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2053-5315
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRHospital São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversidade Federal do Piauí · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital Santa Paula · BRHospital São Vicente · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRUniversidade de Passo Fundo · BRUniversidade do Estado da Bahia · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In real-world experience, the number of patients using vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy was low. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease (CD) biologic-naïve patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective multicentric cohort study with patients who had clinical activity scores (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI]) measured at baseline and weeks 12, 26, 52, as well as at the last follow-up. Clinical response was defined as a reduction ≥3 in HBI, whereas clinical remission as HBI ≤4. Mucosal healing was defined as the complete absence of ulcers in control colonoscopies. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the persistence with vedolizumab. Results: From a total of 66 patients, 53% (35/66) reached clinical remission at week 12. This percentage increased to 69.7% (46/66) at week 26, and 78.8% (52/66) at week 52. Mucosal healing was achieved in 62.3% (33/53) of patients. Vedolizumab was well tolerated, and most adverse events were minor. During vedolizumab treatment, 3/66 patients underwent surgery. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab as a first-line biological agent in patients with mild-to-moderate CD.

Indexed as

biological therapyCrohn diseaseinflammatory bowel diseases

Identifiers

PMID37859629
PMCPMC10583759
OpenAlexW4386947410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.