Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37859598›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2023

Modified interactive Q-learning for attenuating the impact of model misspecification with treatment effect heterogeneity.

Yuan Zhang, David M Vock, Megan E Patrick, Thomas A Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuan ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7626-9514
David M VockDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Megan E PatrickInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Thomas A MurrayDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2769-4957

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
An Adaptive Preventive Intervention to Optimize the Transition from Universal to Indicated Resources for College Student Alcohol UseR01AA026574 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PATRICK, MEGAN E. · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
SMART-ACT: Spatial Methodologic Approaches for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Adaptation in Cancer TreatmentR01CA214825 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
QuBBD: Precision E –Radiomics for Dynamic Big Head & Neck Cancer Data R01CA225190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2017 to 2019
$776k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214825NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225190NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA026574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial, which incorporates multiple stages of randomization, is a popular approach for collecting data to inform personalized and adaptive treatments. There is an extensive literature on statistical methods to analyze data collected in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials and estimate the optimal dynamic treatment regime. Q-learning with linear regression is widely used for this purpose due to its ease of implementation. However, model misspecification is a common problem with this approach, and little attention has been given to the impact of model misspecification when treatment effects are heterogeneous across subjects. This article describes the integrative impact of two possible types of model misspecification related to treatment effect heterogeneity: omitted early-stage treatment effects in late-stage main effect model, and violated linearity assumption between pseudo-outcomes and predictors despite non-linearity arising from the optimization operation. The proposed method, aiming to deal with both types of misspecification concomitantly, builds interactive models into modified parametric Q-learning with Murphy's regret function. Simulations show that the proposed method is robust to both sources of model misspecification. The proposed method is applied to a two-stage sequential multiple assignment randomized trial with embedded tailoring aimed at reducing binge drinking in first-year college students.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalHumansLinear ModelsDynamic treatment regimeheterogeneous treatment effectmain effect model misspecificationomitted variable biassequential multiple assignment randomized trial

Identifiers

PMID37859598
PMCPMC10683339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.