ArticleMethods in enzymology2023
Fragment-based screening by protein-detected NMR spectroscopy.
Article in Methods in enzymology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disrupting the ASH2L-DPY30 PPI in cancer: structure, function, and therapeutic opportunities in H3K4 methylation.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2026Review
- Polybromo‑1 Bromodomain Inhibitor Selectivity Is Mediated by a Unique Ligand-Binding Pocket.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Macromolecular crystallography for mammalian body temperature in support of molecular biophysics methods.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Catalytic Serine Labeling in Nonaqueous, Acidic Media.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- The TRIM33 Bromodomain Recognizes Histone Lysine Lactylation.ACS chemical biology · 2024Article
- Application of CoLD-CoP to Detecting Competitively and Cooperatively Binding Ligands.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Rapid Protein-Ligand Affinity Determination by Photoinduced Hyperpolarized NMR.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Light-coupled cryogenic probes to detect low-micromolar samples and allow for an automated NMR platform.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD) identifies low molecular weight compounds that can be developed into ligands with high affinity and selectivity for therapeutic targets. Screening fragment libraries (<10,000 molecules) with biophysical techniques against macromolecules provides information about novel chemical spaces that bind the macromolecule and scaffolds that can be modified to increase potency. A fragment-screening pipeline requires a standardized protocol for target selection, library assembly and maintenance, library screening, and hit validation to ensure hit integrity. Herein, the fundamental aspects of a fragment screening pipeline-focusing on protein-detected NMR data collection and analysis-are discussed in detail for researchers to use as a resource in their FBDD projects. Selected screening targets must undergo rigorous stability and buffer testing by NMR spectroscopy to ensure the protein structure is stable for the entire screen. Biophysical instrumentation that rapidly measures protein thermostability is helpful in buffer screening. Molecules in fragment libraries are analyzed computationally and physically, stored at appropriate temperatures, and multiplexed in well plates for library conservation. The screening protocol is streamlined using liquid handling robotics for sample preparation and customized Python scripts for protein-detected NMR data analysis. Molecules identified from the screen are titrated to determine their binding site(s) and K
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.