Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37858262›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Using the multiphase optimization strategy to adapt cognitive processing therapy (CPT MOST): study protocol for a randomized controlled factorial experiment.

Rebecca K Sripada, Cassaundra L Peterson, John J Dziak, Inbal Nahum-Shani, Erika M Roberge, Amber A Martinson, Katherine Porter, Peter Grau, Diana Curtis, Sydney McElroy and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05220137 (Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy to Adapt Cognitive Processing Therapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05220137 nacompletednot on this map

Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy to Adapt Cognitive Processing Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2022 to 2026Enrolled271ConditionsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticArmsModified A-B-C: Working with Events, Thoughts, and Feelings, Challenging Questions, Patterns of Problematic Thinking, Challenging Beliefs, Veteran's choice of Module (Safety/Trust/Power and Control/Esteem/Intimacy)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca K SripadaVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. rebecca.sripada@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2844-3458
Cassaundra L PetersonVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, USA.
John J DziakInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Inbal Nahum-ShaniUniversity of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, USA.
Erika M RobergeVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.
Amber A MartinsonVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, USA.
Katherine PorterVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, USA.
Peter GrauVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Diana CurtisVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, USA.
Sydney McElroyCincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA.
Sarah BryantVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, USA.
Isabel GracyVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, USA.
Cosette PryorVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, USA.
Heather M WaltersVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, USA.
Karen AustinVA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, USA.
Carolina EhlingerCincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA.
Nina SayerCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, USA.
Shannon Wiltsey-StirmanVA National Center for PTSD, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Kathleen ChardCincinnati VA Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · USCincinnati VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · USMinneapolis VA Health Care System · USNational Center for PTSD · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Pilot and Mentoring CoreP50DA054039 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Inbal Billie Nahum-Shani · 2021 to 2026
$18.2M
Novel Methods for Intensive Longitudinal Data in SMART Studies of Drug Abuse and HIVR01DA039901 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALMIRALL, DANIEL, NAHUM-SHANI, INBAL BILLIE · 2015 to 2024
$5.4M
Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy to Adapt Cognitive Processing TherapyI01HX003487 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI SRIPADA, REBECCA KAUFMAN · 2022 to 2025
–
HSRD VA I01 HX003487NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054039NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately ten percent of US military veterans suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) is a highly effective, evidence-based, first-line treatment for PTSD that has been widely adopted by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). CPT consists of discrete therapeutic components delivered across 12 sessions, but most veterans (up to 70%) never reach completion, and those who discontinue therapy receive only four sessions on average. Unfortunately, veterans who drop out prematurely may never receive the most effective components of CPT. Thus, there is an urgent need to use empirical approaches to identify the most effective components of CPT so CPT can be adapted into a briefer format.

methodsThe multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) is an innovative, engineering-inspired framework that uses an optimization trial to assess the performance of individual intervention components within a multicomponent intervention such as CPT. Here we use a fractional factorial optimization trial to identify and retain the most effective intervention components to form a refined, abbreviated CPT intervention package. Specifically, we used a 16-condition fractional factorial experiment with 270 veterans (N = 270) at three VA Medical Centers to test the effectiveness of each of the five CPT components and each two-way interaction between components. This factorial design will identify which CPT components contribute meaningfully to a reduction in PTSD symptoms, as measured by PTSD symptom reduction on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5, across 6 months of follow-up. It will also identify mediators and moderators of component effectiveness. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need to adapt CPT into a briefer format using empirical approaches to identify its most effective components. A brief format of CPT may reduce attrition and improve efficiency, enabling providers to treat more patients with PTSD. The refined intervention package will be evaluated in a future large-scale, fully-powered effectiveness trial. Pending demonstration of effectiveness, the refined intervention can be disseminated through the VA CPT training program.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05220137. Registration date: January 21, 2022.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransAnxietyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeCognitive processing therapyCPTEBPEvidence-based psychotherapyEvidence-based treatmentFactorialMOSTMultiphase optimization studyPosttraumatic stress disorderPTSD

Identifiers

PMID37858262
PMCPMC10588087
OpenAlexW4387774565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.