Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37858250›Full record

ArticleJournal of physiological anthropology2023

Venous dilation effect of hot towel (moist and dry heat) versus hot pack for peripheral intravenous catheterization: a quasi-experimental study.

Kae Yasuda, Inaho Shishido, Michito Murayama, Sanae Kaga, Rika Yano

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physiological anthropology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kae YasudaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12, W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2050-8085
Inaho ShishidoFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12, W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-111X
Michito MurayamaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12, W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9249-9093
Sanae KagaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12, W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5718-9540
Rika YanoFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12, W5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0812, Japan. r-yano@med.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5243-8763
Hokkaido University · JPHealth Sciences University of Hokkaido · JP

Funding

JST SPRING JPMJSP2119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeat application before peripheral intravenous catheterization is recommended for venous dilation. Hot pack application enlarges the venous diameter in healthy adults; however, hot towels (moist and dry heat) are used often in some medical cases. However, it is unclear whether hot towel application promotes venous dilation better than hot pack application. This study compared the venous dilation effect of using a hot towel (moist and dry heat) to a hot pack before applying the tourniquet at an access site for peripheral intravenous catheterization.

methodsEighty-eight healthy females aged 18-29 years were recruited for this quasi-experimental study. They underwent three types of heat applications (hot pack, moist hot towel, and dry hot towel [moist hot towel wrapped in a dry plastic bag], all of which were warmed to 40 ± 2 °C and performed for 7 min) to their forearm and tourniquet application for 30 s after each heating. Venous diameter and depth were measured using ultrasonography, and venous palpability and visibility (venous assessment score) was observed as venous dilatation effects. In addition, the skin temperature, stratum corneum hydration, and subjective evaluation of the warmth were measured.

resultsThere were no significant differences in venous diameter and assessment scores after intervention between the dry hot towel and the hot pack groups, and the effect size was negligible (Cohen's d < 0.20). However, these measurements were significantly lower for the moist hot towel than for the other two heat applications (P < .001). Although there was no significant difference in skin temperature and warmth rating score between the dry hot towel and the hot pack, these were significantly lower for the moist hot towel than for the other two heat applications (P < .001). The amount of change in stratum corneum hydration of the dry hot towel was not significantly different from that of the hot pack; however, that of the moist hot towel was significantly larger than that of the other two heat applications (P < . 001.)

conclusionsA method in which a towel warmed in hot water is wrapped in a dry barrier may be an alternative to a hot pack.

trial registrationThis study was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (Registration No.: UMIN000048308. Registered on July 7, 2022).

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureSkin TemperatureAdultCatheterizationDilatationFemaleHumansWaterWaterHeatingHot packHot towelPeripheral intravenous catheterizationSkin temperatureVeinVenous dilation

Identifiers

PMID37858250
PMCPMC10585830
OpenAlexW4387779378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.