Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37858110›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

What do mothers think about their antenatal classes? A mixed-method study in Switzerland.

Valérie Avignon, Laurent Gaucher, David Baud, Hélène Legardeur, Corinne Dupont, Antje Horsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valérie AvignonDepartment Woman-Mother-Child, Obstetric Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Avenue Pierre-Decker 2, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland.
Laurent GaucherResearch on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, 69008, France.
David BaudDepartment Woman-Mother-Child, Obstetric Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Avenue Pierre-Decker 2, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland.
Hélène LegardeurDepartment Woman-Mother-Child, Obstetric Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Avenue Pierre-Decker 2, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland.
Corinne DupontResearch on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, 69008, France.
Antje HorschDepartment Woman-Mother-Child, Obstetric Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Avenue Pierre-Decker 2, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland. Antje.Horsch@chuv.ch.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHHôpital Louis-Mourier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemResearch so far has evaluated the effect of antenatal classes, but few studies have investigated its usefulness from the perspective of mothers after birth.

backgroundAntenatal classes evolved from pain management to a mother-centred approach, including birth plans and parenting education. Evaluating the perception of the usefulness of these classes is important to meet mother's needs. However, so far, research on the mothers' perception of the usefulness of these classes is sparse, particularly when measured after childbirth. Given that antenatal classes are considered as adult education, it is necessary to carry out this evaluation after mothers have had an opportunity to apply some of the competences they acquired during the antenatal classes during their childbirth.

aimThis study investigated mothers' satisfaction and perceived usefulness of antenatal classes provided within a university hospital in Switzerland, as assessed in the postpartum period.

methodsPrimiparous mothers who gave birth at a Swiss university hospital from January 2018 to September 2020 were contacted. Those who had attended the hospital's antenatal classes were invited to complete a questionnaire consisting of a quantitative and qualitative part about usefulness and satisfaction about antenatal classes. Quantitative data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.

findingsAmong the 259 mothers who answered, 61% (n = 158) were globally satisfied with the antenatal classes and 56.2% (n = 145) found the sessions useful in general. However, looking at the utility score of each theme, none of them achieved a score of usefulness above 44%. The timing of some of these sessions was questioned. Some mothers regretted the lack of accurate information, especially on labour complications and postnatal care. DISCUSSION: Antenatal classes were valued for their peer support. However, in their salutogenic vision of empowerment, they did not address the complications of childbirth, even though this was what some mothers needed. Furthermore, these classes could also be more oriented towards the postpartum period, as requested by some mothers.

conclusionRevising antenatal classes to fit mothers' needs could lead to greater satisfaction and thus a better impact on the well-being of mothers and their families.

Indexed as

MothersPrenatal CareAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancySwitzerlandDeliveryMaternal health servicesObstetricPatient satisfactionPregnant mothersPrenatal education

Identifiers

PMID37858110
PMCPMC10585766
OpenAlexW4387775972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.