ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023
Cardiac arrhythmia detection using deep learning approach and time frequency representation of ECG signals.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- SpecAtt-Net: Time-Frequency-Based Image Representations of Slice-Level Radiomic Features for Explainable Lung Cancer Classification via Slice-Wise Activation Mapping.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wearable Devices and Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Monitoring: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Explainable hybrid deep learning framework with Grad-CAM for heartbeat-level arrhythmia classification.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Interpretable arrhythmia detection in ECG scans using deep learning ensembles: a genetic programming approach.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Multi-Classification Model for PPG Signal Arrhythmia Based on Time-Frequency Dual-Domain Attention Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Arrhythmia detection with transfer learning architecture integrating the developed optimization algorithm and regularization method.BMC biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Reliable ECG Anomaly Detection on Edge Devices for Internet of Medical Things Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Electrocardiogram analysis for cardiac arrhythmia classification and prediction through self attention based auto encoder.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ECG Signal Classification of Cardiovascular Disorder using CWT and DCNN.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2025Article
- Advancing cardiac diagnostics: high-accuracy arrhythmia classification with the EGOLF-net model.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Detection of Arrhythmia Using ECG Signals - A Comprehensive Review.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Review
- An Arrhythmia classification approach via deep learning using single-lead ECG without QRS wave detection.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling of biomedical temporal data in healthcare applications: review and future directions.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac arrhythmia is a cardiovascular disorder characterized by disturbances in the heartbeat caused by electrical conduction anomalies in cardiac muscle. Clinically, ECG machines are utilized to diagnose and monitor cardiac arrhythmia noninvasively. Since ECG signals are dynamic in nature and depict various complex information, visual assessment and analysis are time consuming and very difficult. Therefore, an automated system that can assist physicians in the easy detection of arrhythmia is needed.
methodThe main objective of this study was to create an automated deep learning model capable of accurately classifying ECG signals into three categories: cardiac arrhythmia (ARR), congestive heart failure (CHF), and normal sinus rhythm (NSR). To achieve this, ECG data from the MIT-BIH and BIDMC databases available on PhysioNet were preprocessed and segmented before being utilized for deep learning model training. Pretrained models, ResNet 50 and AlexNet, were fine-tuned and configured to achieve optimal classification results. The main outcome measures for evaluating the performance of the model were F-measure, recall, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, obtained from a multi-class confusion matrix.
resultThe proposed deep learning model showed overall classification accuracy of 99.2%, average sensitivity of 99.2%, average specificity of 99.6%, average recall, precision and F- measure of 99.2% of test data.
conclusionThe proposed work introduced a robust approach for the classification of arrhythmias in comparison with the most recent state of the art and will reduce the diagnosis time and error that occurs in the visual investigation of ECG signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.