ArticleBMC medical imaging2023
Changes in radiomic and radiologic features in meningiomas after radiation therapy.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning for predicting post-operative outcomes in meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning in MRI Brain Imaging: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multimodal radiomics in glioma: predicting recurrence in the peritumoural brain zone using integrated MRI.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a predictive model combining radiomics and deep learning features for spread through air spaces in stage T1 non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated the radiologic and radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in meningioma after radiation therapy and investigated the impact of radiation therapy in treating meningioma based on routine brain MRI.
methodsObservation (n = 100) and radiation therapy (n = 62) patients with meningioma who underwent MRI were randomly divided (7:3 ratio) into training (n = 118) and validation (n = 44) groups. Radiologic findings were analyzed. Radiomic features (filter types: original, square, logarithm, exponential, wavelet; feature types: first order, texture, shape) were extracted from the MRI. The most significant radiomic features were selected and applied to quantify the imaging phenotype using random forest machine learning algorithms. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for predicting both the training and validation sets were computed with multiple-hypothesis correction.
resultsThe radiologic difference in the maximum area and diameter of meningiomas between two groups was statistically significant. The tumor decreased in the treatment group. A total of 241 series and 1691 radiomic features were extracted from the training set. In univariate analysis, 24 radiomic features were significantly different (P < 0.05) between both groups. Best subsets were one original, three first-order, and six wavelet-based features, with an AUC of 0.87, showing significant differences (P < 0.05) in multivariate analysis. When applying the model, AUC was 0.76 and 0.79 for the training and validation set, respectively.
conclusionIn meningioma cases, better size reduction can be expected after radiation treatment. The radiomic model using MRI showed significant changes in radiomic features after radiation treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.