ArticleBMC medical imaging2023
Nuclei instance segmentation from histopathology images using Bayesian dropout based deep learning.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast mammary gland dataset (BMGD): DAPI-stained fluorescent images for nuclei segmentation.Data in brief · 2026Article
- HistoNeXt: dual-mechanism feature pyramid network for cell nuclear segmentation and classification.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe deterministic deep learning models have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various medical image analysis tasks, including nuclei segmentation from histopathology images. The deterministic models focus on improving the model prediction accuracy without assessing the confidence in the predictions.
methodsWe propose a semantic segmentation model using Bayesian representation to segment nuclei from the histopathology images and to further quantify the epistemic uncertainty. We employ Bayesian approximation with Monte-Carlo (MC) dropout during the inference time to estimate the model's prediction uncertainty.
resultsWe evaluate the performance of the proposed approach on the PanNuke dataset, which consists of 312 visual fields from 19 organ types. We compare the nuclei segmentation accuracy of our approach with that of a fully convolutional neural network, U-Net, SegNet, and the state-of-the-art Hover-net. We use F1-score and intersection over union (IoU) as the evaluation metrics. The proposed approach achieves a mean F1-score of 0.893 ± 0.008 and an IoU value of 0.868 ± 0.003 on the test set of the PanNuke dataset. These results outperform the Hover-net, which has a mean F1-score of 0.871 ± 0.010 and an IoU value of 0.840 ± 0.032.
conclusionsThe proposed approach, which incorporates Bayesian representation and Monte-Carlo dropout, demonstrates superior performance in segmenting nuclei from histopathology images compared to existing models such as U-Net, SegNet, and Hover-net. By considering the epistemic uncertainty, our model provides a more reliable estimation of the prediction confidence. These findings highlight the potential of Bayesian deep learning for improving medical image analysis tasks and can contribute to the development of more accurate and reliable computer-aided diagnostic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.