Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37858041›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2023

Establishing the core elements of a frailty at the front door model of care using a modified real-time Delphi technique.

Íde O'Shaughnessy, Christine Fitzgerald, Aoife Whiston, Patrick Harnett, Helen Whitty, Des Mulligan, Marian Mullaney, Catherine Devaney, Deirdre Lang, Jennifer Hardimann and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Íde O'ShaughnessySchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. Ide.OShaughnessy@ul.ie.
Christine FitzgeraldSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Aoife WhistonSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Patrick HarnettClinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.
Helen WhittyClinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.
Des MulliganClinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.
Marian MullaneyClinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.
Catherine DevaneyClinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.
Deirdre LangClinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.
Jennifer HardimannClinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.
Brian CondonSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Christina HayesSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Alison HolmesSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Louise BarryDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Claire McCormackSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Megan BoundsSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Katie RobinsonSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Margaret O'ConnorSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Damien RyanSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Denys ShchetkovskyEmergency Department, Limerick EM Education Research Training (ALERT), University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland.
Fiona SteedDepartment of Health, Baggot Street, Dublin, Ireland.
Leonora CareyDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland.
Emer AhernClinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.
Rose GalvinSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnovations in models of care for older adults living with frailty presenting to the emergency department (ED) have become a key priority for clinicians, researchers and policymakers due to the deleterious outcomes older adults experience due to prolonged exposure to such an environment. This study aimed to develop a set of expert consensus-based statements underpinning operational design, outcome measurement and evaluation of a Frailty at the Front Door (FFD) model of care for older adults within an Irish context.

methodsA modified real-time Delphi method was used. Facilitation of World Café focus groups with an expert panel of 86 members and seperate advisory groups with a Public and Patient Involvement panel of older adults and members of the Irish Association of Emergency Medicine generated a series of statements on the core elements of the FFD model of care. Statements were analysed thematically and incorporated into a real-time Delphi survey, which was emailed to members of the expert panel. Members were asked to rank 70 statements across nine domains using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria were defined a priori and guided by previous research using 9-point rating scales.

resultsFifty members responded to the survey representing an overall response rate of 58%. Following analyses of the survey responses, the research team reviewed statements for content overlap and refined a final list of statements across the following domains: aims and objectives of the FFD model of care; target population; screening and assessment; interventions; technology; integration of care; evaluation and metrics; and research.

conclusionDevelopment of a consensus derived FFD model of care represents an important step in generating national standards, implementation of a service model as intended and enhances opportunities for scientific impact. Future research should focus on the development of a core outcome set for studies involving older adults in the ED.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansConsensusDelphi techniqueEmergency departmentFrailty at the front doorOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID37858041
PMCPMC10588204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.