ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024
Practical guidelines of the EOTTD for pathological and genetic diagnosis of hydatidiform moles.
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Appraisal of hydatidiform mole incidence and registration rates in Ireland following the establishment of a National Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Registry.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Reappraisal and refined diagnosis of ultrasonography and histological findings for hydatidiform moles: a multicentre retrospective study of 821 patients.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Novel scoring system provides high separation of diploidy and triploidy to aid partial hydatidiform mole diagnosis: an adaption ofJournal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Morphology combined withJournal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of hydatidiform moles usingInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024Article
- Expert Pathology for Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Towards an International Multidisciplinary Team Meeting.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
22 authors at 18 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydatidiform moles are rare and thus most pathologists and geneticists have little experience with their diagnosis. It is important to promptly and correctly identify hydatidiform moles given that they are premalignant disorders associated with a risk of persistent gestational trophoblastic disease and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Improvement in diagnosis can be achieved with uniformization of diagnostic criteria and establishment of algorithms. To this aim, the Pathology and Genetics Working Party of the European Organisation for Treatment of Trophoblastic Diseases has developed guidelines that describe the pathological criteria and ancillary techniques that can be used in the differential diagnosis of hydatidiform moles. These guidelines are based on the best available evidence in the literature, professional experience and consensus of the experts' group involved in its development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.