Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857980›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023

Radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis-a potential method to address the limitation of axilla coverage in cone-beam breast CT: a bi-center retrospective study.

Yueqiang Zhu, Yue Ma, Yuwei Zhang, Aidi Liu, Yafei Wang, Mengran Zhao, Haijie Li, Ni He, Yaopan Wu, Zhaoxiang Ye

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01792999 (Koning Breast CT for Breast Imaging in China), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01792999 phase3completednot on this map

Koning Breast CT for Breast Imaging in China

TypeinterventionalSponsorKoning (Tianjin) Medical Equipment Co., LtdRan2012 to 2014Enrolled418ConditionsBreast CancerArmsContrast-enhanced KBCT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yueqiang ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-6988
Yue MaDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Yuwei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Aidi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Yafei WangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Mengran ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Haijie LiDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Ni HeDepartment of Medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Dong-Feng-Dong Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Yaopan WuDepartment of Medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Dong-Feng-Dong Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Zhaoxiang YeDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China. yezhaoxiang@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3157-8393
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Key Project of Tianjin Medical Industry 16KG130National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC0112600National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC0112601National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC0112605National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2500400National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2500402National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571671Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-009ATianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Fund B2118Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital Fund B2219Tianjin Science and Technology Major Project 19ZXDBSY00080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCone-beam breast CT (CBBCT) has an inherent limitation that the axilla cannot be imaged in its entirety. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on clinical factors and contrast-enhanced (CE) CBBCT radiomics features to predict axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis and complement limited axilla coverage. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 312 patients with breast cancer from two hospitals who underwent CE-CBBCT examination in a clinical trial (NCT01792999) during 2012-2020. Patients from TCIH comprised training set (n = 176) and validation set (n = 43), and patients from SYSUCC comprised external test set (n = 93). 3D ROIs were delineated manually and radiomics features were extracted by 3D Slicer software. RadScore was calculated and radiomics model was constructed after feature selection. Clinical model was built on independent predictors. Nomogram was developed with independent clinical predictors and RadScore. Diagnostic performance was compared among three models by ROC curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility of nomogram.

resultsA total of 139 patients were ALN positive and 173 patients were negative. Twelve radiomics features remained after feature selection. Location and focality were selected as independent predictors for ALN status. The AUC of nomogram in external test set was higher than that of clinical model (0.80 vs. 0.66, p = 0.012). DCA demonstrated that the nomogram had higher overall net benefit than that of clinical model.

conclusionThe nomogram combined CE-CBBCT-based radiomics features and clinical factors could have potential in distinguishing ALN positive from negative and addressing the limitation of axilla coverage in CBBCT.

Indexed as

Lymph NodesNomogramsAxillaHumansLymphatic MetastasisRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBreast neoplasmsCone-beam computed tomographyNomogramRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37857980
OpenAlexW4387769808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.