Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857943›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2023

Economic considerations of breeding for polledness versus disbudding in beef cattle.

Ingrid Pereira Pinto Oliveira, Silel Vinicius Simões Andrade Maciel, Caio Victor Damasceno Carvalho, Raphael Bermal Costa, Gregório Miguel Ferreira de Camargo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingrid Pereira Pinto OliveiraUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5583-262X
Silel Vinicius Simões Andrade MacielUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-6307
Caio Victor Damasceno CarvalhoUniversidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia (UFOB), Barra, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7633-1250
Raphael Bermal CostaUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, BA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-7436
Gregório Miguel Ferreira de CamargoUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, BA, Brazil. gregorio.camargo@ufba.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8736-5576
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestication of animals has rendered horns less necessary for survival. Moreover, the use of polled and disbudded animals is interesting in order to avoid injuries of animals and handlers, among other advantages. We therefore conducted a comparative economic analysis of different traditional disbudding techniques versus selective breeding for polledness in Nelore cattle, the main beef breed of tropical systems in Brazil. The cost to obtain animals without horns was estimated in three different scenarios: disbudding with hot iron, disbudding with caustic paste, and phenotypic selection for polled animals. Price quotations of the materials were obtained in different states of the country and averaged. An initial frequency of horned animals of 92.16% was obtained based on the records of the Brazilian Association of Zebu Breeders. Selective breeding was found to be the best cost-effective scenario. This result differs from intensive production systems of dairy cattle in which traditional disbudding continues to be the best cost-effective scenario. The main explanation is the lack of difference in the price of Nelore semen from polled and horned bulls. Phenotypic selection for polled animals is the best cost-effective method, and it is in accordance with welfare practices. Care should be taken regarding the intensive use of few polled breeding animals in order to avoid inbreeding depression in other traits.

Indexed as

HornsAnimalsCattleDairyingMalePhenotypeSelective BreedingSemenAnimal welfareBos taurus indicusGenetic selectionHornLivestockNelore

Identifiers

PMID37857943
OpenAlexW4387772474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.