Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857933›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2023

Systematic differences in discovery of genetic effects on gene expression and complex traits.

Hakhamanesh Mostafavi, Jeffrey P Spence, Sahin Naqvi, Jonathan K Pritchard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 254 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
254citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
93.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

254 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hakhamanesh MostafaviDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. hmostafavi@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-2844
Jeffrey P SpenceDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3199-1447
Sahin NaqviDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-7967
Jonathan K PritchardDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. pritch@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8828-5236
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Integration of genetic association mapping and functional data to elucidate genetic mechanisms of diseaseR01HG008140 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JONATHAN K PRITCHARD · 2016 to 2026
$7.3M
Predicting context-specific molecular and phenotypic effects of genetic variation through the lens of the cis-regulatory codeU01HG012069 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Anshul Kundaje · 2021 to 2026
$3.9M
New methods for constructing and evaluating polygenic scoresR01HG011432 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PRITCHARD, JONATHAN K · 2020 to 2023
$3.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008140NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011432NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG012069U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) R01HG008140U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) R01HG011432U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) U01HG012069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most signals in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of complex traits implicate noncoding genetic variants with putative gene regulatory effects. However, currently identified regulatory variants, notably expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), explain only a small fraction of GWAS signals. Here, we show that GWAS and cis-eQTL hits are systematically different: eQTLs cluster strongly near transcription start sites, whereas GWAS hits do not. Genes near GWAS hits are enriched in key functional annotations, are under strong selective constraint and have complex regulatory landscapes across different tissue/cell types, whereas genes near eQTLs are depleted of most functional annotations, show relaxed constraint, and have simpler regulatory landscapes. We describe a model to understand these observations, including how natural selection on complex traits hinders discovery of functionally relevant eQTLs. Our results imply that GWAS and eQTL studies are systematically biased toward different types of variant, and support the use of complementary functional approaches alongside the next generation of eQTL studies.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMultifactorial InheritanceGene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID37857933
PMCPMC12270542
OpenAlexW4387782515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.