Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857927›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2023

Interventions to Improve Patient Care on Surgical Ward Rounds: A Systematic Review.

Reuben He, Sameer Bhat, Chris Varghese, Jeremy Rossaak, Celia Keane, Wal Baraza, Cameron I Wells

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reuben HeDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8541-5464
Sameer BhatDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Chris VargheseDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jeremy RossaakDepartment of General Surgery, Tauranga Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Bay of Plenty, Tauranga, New Zealand.
Celia KeaneDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Wal BarazaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cameron I WellsDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. cameron.wells@auckland.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWard rounds are an essential component of surgical and perioperative care. However, the relative effectiveness of different interventions to improve the quality of surgical ward rounds remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of various ward round interventions among surgical patients.

methodsA systematic literature search of the MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and PsycInfo databases was performed on 7 October 2022 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. All studies investigating surgical ward round quality improvement strategies with measurable outcomes were included. Data were analysed via narrative synthesis based on commonly reported themes.

resultsA total of 28 studies were included. Most were cohort studies (n = 25), followed by randomised controlled trials (n = 3). Checklists/proformas were utilised most commonly (n = 22), followed by technological (n = 3), personnel (n = 2), and well-being (n = 1) quality improvement strategies. The majority of checklist interventions (n = 21, 95%) showed significant improvements in documentation compliance, staff understanding, or patient satisfaction. Other less frequently reported ward round interventions demonstrated improvements in communication, patient safety, and reductions in patient stress levels.

conclusionsUse of checklists, technology, personnel, and well-being improvement strategies have been associated with improvements in ward round documentation, communication, as well as staff and patient satisfaction. Future studies should investigate the ease of implementation and long-term durability of these interventions, in addition to their impact on clinically relevant outcomes such as patient morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

HospitalsPatient CareCommunicationHumans

Identifiers

PMID37857927
PMCPMC10694108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.