SynthesisClinical neuroradiology2024
Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes of New Cerebral Microbleeds After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are common in the elderly population, and are associated with an increased risk of stroke and dementia. An acute ischemic stroke event can make CMBs develop rapidly. However, the progression of CMBs after intravenous thrombolysis is not well understood.
methodsFollowing a previously registered protocol, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature up to August 2022. Cohort studies that reported new CMBs in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis were included. Random effects models were used to calculate the pooled estimates.
resultsSeven studies with 1079 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled new CMBs prevalence was 7.6% (95% CI 3.9-14.3%) and 63.6% new CMBs were located in the cerebral lobes. Compared with patients without new CMBs, those with new CMBs were older, had a higher proportion of hypertension, and had higher systolic blood pressure and baseline CMBs burden. The presence of new CMBs increased the likelihood of remote intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 28.75, 95% CI 8.58-96.38) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 15.49, 95% CI 3.21-74.73) but was not related to functional outcomes or hemorrhagic transformation.
conclusionsThe prevalence of new CMBs after intravenous thrombolysis was approximately 7.6%. The presence of new CMBs is associated with remote and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis. Considering the potential long-term adverse effects of CMBs progression, patients at a high risk of developing new CMBs should be identified based on potential risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.