Observational studyPediatric research2024
Combining lung ultrasound and oscillatory mechanics for assessing lung disease in very preterm infants.
Observational study in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intra-breath respiratory oscillometry in the first days of life in preterm infants: a prospective observational study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Use of respiratory oscillometry in infants: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Relationship between simplified and extended lung ultrasound aeration scores and oxygenation metrics in very preterm infants in the first month of life: a prospective observational study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Can pathophysiological lung function markers guide the use of postnatal corticosteroids for bronchopulmonary dysplasia?Pediatric research · 2025Article
- The best of both worlds: Refining respiratory phenotypes through combined non-invasive lung monitoring.Pediatric research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated whether combining lung ultrasound scores (LUSs) and respiratory system reactance (Xrs) measured by respiratory oscillometry explains the severity of lung disease better than individual parameters alone.
methodsWe performed a prospective observational study in very preterm infants. Forced oscillations (10 Hz) were applied using a neonatal mechanical ventilator (Fabian HFOi, Vyaire). We used the simultaneous respiratory severity score (RSS = mean airway pressure × FIO
resultsWe enrolled 61 infants (median (Q1, Q3) gestational age = 30.00 (26.86, 31.00) weeks) and performed 243 measurements at a postnatal age of 26 (13, 41) days and postmenstrual age of 33.14 (30.46, 35.86) weeks. Xrs z-score and LUS were independently associated with simultaneous RSS (p < 0.001 for both). The model including Xrs and LUS explained the RSS significantly better than Xrs (p value LRT < 0.001) or LUS alone (p value LRT < 0.001).
conclusionsCombining LUS and Xrs z-score explains the severity of lung disease better than each parameter alone and has the potential to improve the understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. IMPACT: Combining respiratory system reactance by oscillometry and lung ultrasound score explains the respiratory support requirement (e.g., proxy of the severity of lung disease) significantly better than each parameter alone. We assessed the relationship between lung ultrasound and respiratory system reactance in very preterm infants for the first time. Combining respiratory oscillometry and lung ultrasound has the potential to improve the understanding of respiratory pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.