Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857845›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2024

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in detecting pathogens in pediatric oncology patients with suspected bloodstream infections.

Jing Wu, Wenting Song, Hui Yan, Chengjuan Luo, Wenting Hu, Li Xie, Nan Shen, Qing Cao, Xi Mo, Kang An and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Association between normalizedTranslational pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in children with suspected bloodstream infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Analysis of metagenomic data.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing Wu *Pediatric Translational Medicine Institute, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenting Song *Department of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hui Yan *Pediatric Translational Medicine Institute, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chengjuan LuoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenting HuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Li XieClinical Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Nan ShenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qing CaoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. caoqing@scmc.com.cn.
Xi MoPediatric Translational Medicine Institute, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. xi.mo@shsmu.edu.cn.
Kang AnDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. ankang@scmc.com.cn.
Yue TaoPediatric Translational Medicine Institute, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. taoyue@scmc.com.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-3190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on mNGS application in pediatric oncology patients, who are at high risk of infection, are quite limited.

methodsFrom March 2020 to June 2022, a total of 224 blood samples from 195 pediatric oncology patients who were suspected as bloodstream infections were enrolled in this study. Their clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively reviewed, and the diagnostic performance of mNGS was assessed.

resultsCompared to the reference tests, mNGS showed significantly higher sensitivity (89.8% vs 32.5%, P < 0.001) and clinical agreement (76.3% vs 51.3%, P < 0.001) in detecting potential pathogens and distinguishing BSI from non-BSI. Especially, mNGS had an outstanding performance for virus detection, contributing to 100% clinical diagnosed virus. Samples from patients with neutropenia showed higher incidence of bacterial infections (P = 0.035). The most identified bacteria were Escherichia coli, and the overall infections by gram-negative bacteria were significantly more prevalent than those by gram-positive ones (90% vs 10%, P < 0.001). Overall, mNGS had an impact on the antimicrobial regimens' usage in 54.3% of the samples in this study.

conclusionsmNGS has the advantage of rapid and effective pathogen diagnosis in pediatric oncology patients with suspected BSI, especially for virus. IMPACT: Compared with reference tests, mNGS showed significantly higher sensitivity and clinical agreement in detecting potential pathogens and distinguishing bloodstream infections (BSI) from non-BSI. mNGS is particularly prominent in clinical diagnosed virus detection. The incidence of bacterial infection was higher in patients with neutropenia, and the overall infection rate of Gram-negative bacteria was significantly higher than that of Gram-positive bacteria. mNGS affects the antimicrobial regimens' usage in more than half of patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsNeoplasmsNeutropeniaSepsisChildEscherichia coliHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID37857845
PMCPMC10899103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.